Bergeron you stupid jackass!

That's not the first time that dumbass has done that to Roli. And
that's not the only dumbass play he made tonight. Bergeron and Staios
were brutal tonight ..again.

And then there's pylon Ty. WTF????

We are soooo screwed.

On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 03:25:38 GMT, "Versizz" <versizz.DeleteThis@dontemailme.com>
wrote:

>Was an accident....if he had done nothing and the canes player came out in
>the front of the net and scored people would be yelling at him for doing
>nothing.
>
>"MarioR" <marior.DeleteThis@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:wu6hg.245787$WI1.96811@pd7tw2no...
>> nuff said
>>
>>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Bergeron you stupid jackass! 

"Zeke" <xyz RemoveThis @xyz.com> wrote in message
news:n6u982tc459kbl8ivdbus29tcdjccnaoqr@4ax.com...
> That's not the first time that dumbass has done that to Roli. And
> that's not the only dumbass play he made tonight. Bergeron and Staios
> were brutal tonight ..again.
>
> And then there's pylon Ty. WTF????
>
> We are soooo screwed.

I've never cared for Bergeron save for his brief flirtation with being
steady under the watchful eye of Pronger. Staios right now isn't good
enough to look good on his own never mind carrying Bergeron.
(Confusing tonight as it looked like MacT was almost doubleshifting Bergeron
playing him with Staios and Greene. WTF's with that?
Pairings have to change as against Carolina theres 3 lines that can do
serious damage of the type that we haven't seen this playoff. Especially on
the road we need two- three solid pairs.
 >> Stay informed about: Bergeron you stupid jackass! 

fybar wrote:

> Unlucky play by Conks and a number of bad plays by Oilers
> lead to this loss.

I must be the only one who thinks Smith deserves an equal share of the
blame for that last goal. Conklin shouldn't have played it in the
first place, but Smith had a stick on it, he's the mobile player, it's
his responsibility at that point to move it out.

The rest of the third, I'm guessing, was where the long layoff hit the
Oilers in terms of fatigue and wind, getting a half-step behind most
plays.

> We
> lost a lot of faceoffs.

62/38. And this type of number has been consistent for the Canes
through the playoffs; Ward and faceoffs (particularly by BrindAmour)
have consistently kept us in games against otherwise-superior
opponents.

>Even with all of this, the Oilers were still the
> better team.

Clearly so for the first two periods. The Canes are notorious for
starting sleepy, and going into the finals, we have been a ridiculous
7-4 in the playoffs after giving up the first goal, so at 0-1 we've got
you right where we want you. But going 0-3 for the better part of the
first two periods and getting dominated in most respects, that's a
different hill to climb.

> It will be a tough row to hoe but Edmonton is still capable of winning
> this. We just can't expect a goalie to steal on for us.

Nor can we; Ward has had a tendency to go flat in the middle of each
series. Of course having Gerber on the bench makes this less of a
worry, but it still clouds the crystal ball a bit.

> Go Oil! It ain't even close to over!

Well, it does seem a lot closer to over than it did around the second
intermission last night. It really is a shame about Roloson; the hot
36-year-old journeyman vs. the hot 22-year-old rookie seemed like a
great storyline to follow and we had the makings of an epic. Going in,
everybody knew the seedings were meaningless, but the pressure is all
on Carolina, now: if we win it's because your best player got knocked
out and if we lose it's a huge choke.

JGM
 >> Stay informed about: Bergeron you stupid jackass! 

On 6 Jun 2006 21:04:34 -0700, broonzy.TakeThisOut@videotron.ca wrote:

>To put the onus on Bergeron for that

This was a lot more reasonable assessment of Bergeron's play in those
pivotal moments in Game 1. Whether or not his play has been suspect
at other times I won't argue, but it's apparent to me after watching
replays of the collision with Ladd and the 4th goal that MarioR's
assessment of him is a bit harsh. Understandable, but harsh
nonetheless.

This isn't much different than most everyone's interpretation of the
game-winning goal. As much as it was Conklin's fault, blame lies
equally with Smith. First off, Conklin stopped the puck behind the
net as he should have. Second, he could not clear it by flicking it
out toward Pronger because Brind'Amour was bearing down on him from
that side. Third, if Smith handled the puck in either of his two
attempts to get a stick on it, none of it would've ever happened. I'm
not saying this was Smith's fault either, but to place all the blame
on Conklin is unreasonable.
 >> Stay informed about: Bergeron you stupid jackass!