All's well in the 'Burgh...

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:12:06 GMT, "Brother Freebyrd"
<headbangerz4jesus.DeleteThis@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
><rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org> wrote in message
>news:CV_Oh.150186$Jt2.114574@fe04.news.easynews.com...
>
>> A question mark in goal, aside, the Pittsburghs are looking to go
>> deep in Sid the Kid's second year.
>
>You mean the Penguins don't you? There are many Penguins but only one
>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ....... sheesh ..... we ought to killfile you for
>28 years....
>

I currently have them in the sin bin for the standard 28 days
(actually they have 14 days to go), but I'm thinking about letting
them out on parole because I think I might be starting to miss the
ridiculousness of their posts.

Should I do it?
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

"Krusty" <krusty9875.RemoveThis@SPAMBLOCKyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3m0p03luakcmmnii2e2ijdnrdhdbhmnefp@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 03:12:06 GMT, "Brother Freebyrd"
> <headbangerz4jesus.RemoveThis@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><rm.RemoveThis@biteme.org> wrote in message
>>news:CV_Oh.150186$Jt2.114574@fe04.news.easynews.com...
>>
>>> A question mark in goal, aside, the Pittsburghs are looking to go
>>> deep in Sid the Kid's second year.
>>
>>You mean the Penguins don't you? There are many Penguins but only one
>>Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ....... sheesh ..... we ought to killfile you for
>>28 years....
>>
>
> I currently have them in the sin bin for the standard 28 days
> (actually they have 14 days to go), but I'm thinking about letting
> them out on parole because I think I might be starting to miss the
> ridiculousness of their posts.
>
> Should I do it?

Just let one of them out ;-)
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:

> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
> hottest team

Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?

There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.

--
Anton
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

rm RemoveThis @biteme.org kirjoitti:

> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
> hottest team

Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?

There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one Pittsburg can
be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.

--
Anton
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv.DeleteThis@surfeu.fi.invalid>
wrote:

>rm@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>
>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>> hottest team
>
>Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>
>There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one Pittsburg can
>be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.

Not to be a dick or anything, but there is no Pittsburg with an NHL
team. ;^)
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

Krusty kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv DeleteThis @surfeu.fi.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> rm DeleteThis @biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>
>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>> hottest team
>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>
>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one Pittsburg can
>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.

> Not to be a dick or anything, but there is no Pittsburg with an NHL
> team. ;^)

Aargh! Ih meanth Pittsburgh ofh courseh! :) But I'm european and the
closest to 'Burgh is Hamburg (with no letter 'h')!

--
Anton, The Finn
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:38:28 GMT, Anton <foo.DeleteThis@none.invalid> wrote:

>Krusty kirjoitti:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv.DeleteThis@surfeu.fi.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>> hottest team
>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>
>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one Pittsburg can
>>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>
>> Not to be a dick or anything, but there is no Pittsburg with an NHL
>> team. ;^)
>
>Aargh! Ih meanth Pittsburgh ofh courseh! :) But I'm european and the
>closest to 'Burgh is Hamburg (with no letter 'h')!

Hey, my grandfather was from Germany, spoke German to me...which I
used to understand, and I still have to cut & paste Deutschland to
spell it correctly.
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

Anton <antonv.DeleteThis@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>
>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>> hottest team
>
> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>
> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.

Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.

cordially, as always,

rm
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
> Anton <antonv.TakeThisOut@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>
>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>> hottest team
>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>
>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>
> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.

Ok, if the Pittsburgh in CA doesn't have a team, then which is the other
Pitssburgh (or are the other other Pittsburghs) you we're refering to
earlier then?

--
Anton
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

rm.RemoveThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
> Anton <antonv.RemoveThis@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>> rm.RemoveThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>
>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>> hottest team
>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>
>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>
> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.

Ok, if the Pittsburg in CA doesn't have a team and the name isn't the
same either, then which is the other Pittsburgh (or are the other other
Pittsburghs) you we're refering to
earlier then?

--
Anton
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

Krusty wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv.RemoveThis@surfeu.fi.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>
>>rm@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>
>>
>>>Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>hottest team
>>
>>Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>
>>There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one Pittsburg can
>>be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>
>
> Not to be a dick or anything, but there is no Pittsburg with an NHL
> team. ;^)

Pittsburgh or Pittsburg doesn't have a pro team worth talking about...
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

Krusty wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:38:28 GMT, Anton <foo.RemoveThis@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>
>>Krusty kirjoitti:
>>
>>>On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv.RemoveThis@surfeu.fi.invalid>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>rm@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>>>hottest team
>>>>
>>>>Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>>
>
> Hey, my grandfather was from Germany, spoke German to me...which I
> used to understand, and I still have to cut & paste Deutschland to
> spell it correctly.
>

Really! I thought you and him were from douche land.

Matt
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 

Anton <foo.TakeThisOut@none.invalid> wrote:
> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>> Anton <antonv.TakeThisOut@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>>> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:

>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>> hottest team

>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?

>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one
>>> Pittsburg can be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the
>>> booze, man.

>> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
>> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.

> Ok, if the Pittsburgh in CA doesn't have a team, then which is the
> other Pitssburgh (or are the other other Pittsburghs) you we're
> refering to earlier then?

We were only referring to one Pittsburgh. But the Pittsburgh we
were referring can be a plural since more than one player is
referred to when we call them the Pittsburghs.

This is all just a bit silly, isn't it?

cordially, as always,

rm
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh...