 |
|
 |
|
Next: the honeymoon is over . . .
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Oct 20, 2006 Posts: 4
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 2:35 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>pit-penguins (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Wed Dec 13, 2006 12:46 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Not only are Canadians bad at math, but they are also terrible at most
> other things, so I feel comfortable throwing anything out there and
> saying Canadians are bad at it.
>
> Just one of those things!"
(Glues a big gold star onto Matt's giant Mongoloid head...)
There's a good little retard....
On Nov 27, 5:35 pm, "Matt" <mdw233... RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote:
> Not only are Canadians bad at math, but they are also terrible at most
> other things, so I feel comfortable throwing anything out there and
> saying Canadians are bad at it.
>
> Just one of those things! >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:05 am
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"« LJ" <LSJR71 DeleteThis @gmail.NOcom> wrote in
news:Xns9898D1FBB8636LJ11@DrummerWorld.com:
> ElHammero DeleteThis @gmail.com posted:
>
> I'm curious, why are you trolling this group? I mean this ridiculous
> hatred of Mario can only be explained by your step-father wearing a
> Lemieux jersey during his late-night visits to your room.
>
>
> Back to the game...
>
lol.
niiiiice. :p >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 9:58 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"« LJ" <LSJR71.RemoveThis@gmail.NOcom> wrote in
news:Xns989AA667CC178LJ11@DrummerWorld.com:
EXHIBIT A:
> you've gone from
> "A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER" to praising him.
EXHIBIT B:
> makes your posts look like
> you're arguing with yourself.
>
CONCLUSION:
He IS arguing with himself!
>
>
> That is all...*plonk*.
awwwww.... gunna KF the troll? NO FUN! :)
KF the racist scum, down there instead. This guy is kind of amusing.
> GO PENS!
> >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 04, 2007 Posts: 69
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Thu Dec 21, 2006 2:13 am
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare982.DeleteThis@netzer0.com> posted:
>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a simpleton.
>
> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.
>
Jagr was being paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought Mario
could've kept him?
Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what they
demanded.
Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1 >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 12:58 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
LJ
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
Yes or no?
(Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)
On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ....TakeThisOut@gmail.NOcom> wrote:
> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare....TakeThisOut@netzer0.com> posted:
>
> >> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a simpleton.
>
> > Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was being paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought Mario
> could've kept him?
>
> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what they
> demanded.
>
> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1 >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 47
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Sat Dec 23, 2006 11:08 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:1166907537.136004.89240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
ElHammero.TakeThisOut@gmail.com <ElHammero.TakeThisOut@gmail.com> typed:
> LJ
>
> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
>
> ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
>
> Yes or no?
>
> (Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)
I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year. By
the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question which
means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing insult on
his reply.
>
> On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ....TakeThisOut@gmail.NOcom> wrote:
>> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare....TakeThisOut@netzer0.com> posted:
>>
>>>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a
>>>> simpleton.
>>
>>> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was being
>>> paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
>> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought Mario
>> could've kept him?
>>
>> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what
>> they
>> demanded.
>>
>> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
>> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
>> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
>> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1 >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 6:03 am
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
jth976_the_big_dirty.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com wrote in
news:1166917398.406981.109890@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
> "What was this about
>> again?"
>
> Your proven hypocrisy, and that fact that you're too stupid to realize
> it.
>
>
I'd love to stay and argue with ya a little more. Your infantile wise-
assisms DID make me laugh... unfortunatley, you've bored me now. All ya
seem to have is "hypocrite" and "stupid". Dull. Very dull.
Come back when ya get creative.
And seriously... anger management... before ya snap and start picking
off student nurses from a bell tower or something. damn. >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:46 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"I'm not LJ,..."
I doubt you're even human, judging by your blatant, endless stupidity.
"...but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year."
It gets even smaller if you compare it to the Hope diamond. Why don't
you run with that, brokenhead?
"By
the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question
which
means LJ can't possibly be wrong."
LJ can have the opinion that jumping off a cliff is a good idea but....
well, actually, when it comes to walking genetic mistake like you, that
actually IS a good idea. heh
On Dec 23, 11:08 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
<Nightmare....DeleteThis@netzer0.com> wrote:
> Innews:1166907537.136004.89240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
> ElHamm....DeleteThis@gmail.com <ElHamm....DeleteThis@gmail.com> typed:
>
> > LJ
>
> > Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
>
> > ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
>
> > Yes or no?
>
> > (Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year. By
> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question which
> means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing insult on
> his reply.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ....DeleteThis@gmail.NOcom> wrote:
> >> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare....DeleteThis@netzer0.com> posted:
>
> >>>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a
> >>>> simpleton.
>
> >>> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was being
> >>> paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
> >> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought Mario
> >> could've kept him?
>
> >> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what
> >> they
> >> demanded.
>
> >> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
> >> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
> >> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
> >> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:49 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"I'd love to stay and argue with ya a little more. Your infantile
wise-
assisms DID make me laugh... unfortunatley, you've bored me now. All
ya
seem to have is "hypocrite" and "stupid". Dull. Very dull. "
Translation: Sucker cannot even face the issue of his proven hypocrisy,
so like the spineless little twerp he is, he claims 'boredom'... while
taking the time to reply to me.
I'm telling ya, rolling you inferiors into the dirt?
too easy.
On Dec 24, 1:03 am, Stalker <stal....RemoveThis@yer.window> wrote:
> jth976_the_big_di....RemoveThis@yahoo.com wrote innews:1166917398.406981.109890@a3g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:
>
> > "What was this about
> >> again?"
>
> > Your proven hypocrisy, and that fact that you're too stupid to realize
> > it.I'd love to stay and argue with ya a little more. Your infantile wise-
> assisms DID make me laugh... unfortunatley, you've bored me now. All ya
> seem to have is "hypocrite" and "stupid". Dull. Very dull.
>
> Come back when ya get creative.
>
> And seriously... anger management... before ya snap and start picking
> off student nurses from a bell tower or something. damn. >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 1:51 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"I have him killfiled, so I only see your responses to him. Arguing
over
Mario is ridiculous and simply, a waste of time. "
But apparently it WASN'T a 'waste of time' up until the point where I
shoved his ignorance and stupidity into his chromosome-missing face.
Oh well, another victory for I, The Hammer!
yyyyyyyyyeeeeeeeeeaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!
On Dec 24, 1:25 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ... DeleteThis @gmail.NOcom> wrote:
> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare... DeleteThis @netzer0.com> posted:
>
> > I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year.
> > By the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question
> > which means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing
> > insult on his reply.I have him killfiled, so I only see your responses to him. Arguing over
> Mario is ridiculous and simply, a waste of time. >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 7
|
(Msg. 27) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:06 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I'm sure you'd like for me to chase after every pointless red herring
you try and serve up, but the fact remains that you DID criticize my
spelling, and until you admit error, you remain owned by I, The Hammer,
and there's not a goddamn thing you can do to change it.
Happy New Year, wretard.
On Dec 24, 6:26 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
<Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> wrote:
> Innews:1166996792.116468.55790@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
> ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com <ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com> typed:
>
> > "I'm not LJ,..."
>
> > I doubt you're even human, judging by your blatant, endless stupidity.PPOR.
>
>
>
> > "...but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year."
>
> > It gets even smaller if you compare it to the Hope diamond. Why don't
> > you run with that, brokenhead?There's a difference between an unrelated, priceless gem and another hockey
> player who isn't even of the same caliber.
>
>
>
> > "By
> > the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question
> > which
> > means LJ can't possibly be wrong."
>
> > LJ can have the opinion that jumping off a cliff is a good idea
> > but....
> > well, actually, when it comes to walking genetic mistake like you,
> > that
> > actually IS a good idea. hehYou're the only one laughing. Everyone else knows you love the taste of
> those short bus windows.
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Dec 23, 11:08 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
> > <Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> wrote:
> >> Innews:1166907537.136004.89240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
> >> ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com <ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com> typed:
>
> >>> LJ
>
> >>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
>
> >>> ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
>
> >>> Yes or no?
>
> >>> (Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in
> >>> comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year. By
> >> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion
> >> question which
> >> means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing
> >> insult on
> >> his reply.
>
> >>> On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ... RemoveThis @gmail.NOcom> wrote:
> >>>> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> posted:
>
> >>>>>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a
> >>>>>> simpleton.
>
> >>>>> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was being
> >>>>> paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
> >>>> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought
> >>>> Mario
> >>>> could've kept him?
>
> >>>> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what
> >>>> they
> >>>> demanded.
>
> >>>> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
> >>>> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
> >>>> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
> >>>> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1- Hide quoted
> >>>> text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 04, 2007 Posts: 69
|
(Msg. 28) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 6:25 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare982.RemoveThis@netzer0.com> posted:
> I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year.
> By the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question
> which means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing
> insult on his reply.
>
I have him killfiled, so I only see your responses to him. Arguing over
Mario is ridiculous and simply, a waste of time. >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 47
|
(Msg. 29) Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 6:26 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:1166996792.116468.55790@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
ElHammero.DeleteThis@gmail.com <ElHammero.DeleteThis@gmail.com> typed:
> "I'm not LJ,..."
>
> I doubt you're even human, judging by your blatant, endless stupidity.
PPOR.
>
> "...but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year."
>
> It gets even smaller if you compare it to the Hope diamond. Why don't
> you run with that, brokenhead?
There's a difference between an unrelated, priceless gem and another hockey
player who isn't even of the same caliber.
>
> "By
> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion question
> which
> means LJ can't possibly be wrong."
>
> LJ can have the opinion that jumping off a cliff is a good idea
> but....
> well, actually, when it comes to walking genetic mistake like you,
> that
> actually IS a good idea. heh
You're the only one laughing. Everyone else knows you love the taste of
those short bus windows.
>
> On Dec 23, 11:08 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
> <Nightmare....DeleteThis@netzer0.com> wrote:
>> Innews:1166907537.136004.89240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
>> ElHamm....DeleteThis@gmail.com <ElHamm....DeleteThis@gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>> LJ
>>
>>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
>>
>>> ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
>>
>>> Yes or no?
>>
>>> (Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in
>>> comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year. By
>> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion
>> question which
>> means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing
>> insult on
>> his reply.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ....DeleteThis@gmail.NOcom> wrote:
>>>> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare....DeleteThis@netzer0.com> posted:
>>
>>>>>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a
>>>>>> simpleton.
>>
>>>>> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was being
>>>>> paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
>>>> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought
>>>> Mario
>>>> could've kept him?
>>
>>>> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded & what
>>>> they
>>>> demanded.
>>
>>>> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
>>>> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
>>>> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
>>>> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1- Hide quoted
>>>> text -- Show quoted text - >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 47
|
(Msg. 30) Posted: Mon Dec 25, 2006 7:23 pm
Post subject: Re: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In news:1167005182.758306.88190@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com,
ElHammero RemoveThis @gmail.com <ElHammero RemoveThis @gmail.com> typed:
> I'm sure you'd like for me to chase after every pointless red herring
> you try and serve up, but the fact remains that you DID criticize my
> spelling, and until you admit error, you remain owned by I, The
> Hammer,
> and there's not a goddamn thing you can do to change it.
>
> Happy New Year, wretard.
You've just proven you're the retard. Thanks.
>
>
> On Dec 24, 6:26 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
> <Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> wrote:
>> Innews:1166996792.116468.55790@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
>> ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com <ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>> "I'm not LJ,..."
>>
>>> I doubt you're even human, judging by your blatant, endless
>>> stupidity.PPOR.
>>
>>
>>
>>> "...but it's not huge in comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year."
>>
>>> It gets even smaller if you compare it to the Hope diamond. Why
>>> don't
>>> you run with that, brokenhead?There's a difference between an
>>> unrelated, priceless gem and another hockey
>> player who isn't even of the same caliber.
>>
>>
>>
>>> "By
>>> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion
>>> question
>>> which
>>> means LJ can't possibly be wrong."
>>
>>> LJ can have the opinion that jumping off a cliff is a good idea
>>> but....
>>> well, actually, when it comes to walking genetic mistake like you,
>>> that
>>> actually IS a good idea. hehYou're the only one laughing. Everyone
>>> else knows you love the taste of
>> those short bus windows.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Dec 23, 11:08 pm, "§¦«The Wraith»¦§"
>>> <Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> wrote:
>>>> Innews:1166907537.136004.89240@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com,
>>>> ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com <ElHamm... RemoveThis @gmail.com> typed:
>>
>>>>> LJ
>>
>>>>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaagain,
>>
>>>>> ARE you saying 5.25 M a year ISN'T huge?
>>
>>>>> Yes or no?
>>
>>>>> (Awaits LJ's brilliant reply...)I'm not LJ, but it's not huge in
>>>>> comparison to 7M a year or 11M a year. By
>>>> the way, in case you weren't aware, you're asking an opinion
>>>> question which
>>>> means LJ can't possibly be wrong. Good luck with your ego-killing
>>>> insult on
>>>> his reply.
>>
>>>>> On Dec 20, 9:13 pm, "« LJ" <LSJ... RemoveThis @gmail.NOcom> wrote:
>>>>>> "§¦«The Wraith»¦§" <Nightmare... RemoveThis @netzer0.com> posted:
>>
>>>>>>>> 5.25 million a year? That's NOT 'huge'? hahahahahaha What a
>>>>>>>> simpleton.
>>
>>>>>>> Compare Jagr's contract to Lemieux's. It's not huge.Jagr was
>>>>>>> being
>>>>>>> paid $9.8 million in 2000-2001, he was traded to the Capitals
>>>>>> and they gave him $11.5 million/year. And that dipshit thought
>>>>>> Mario
>>>>>> could've kept him?
>>
>>>>>> Plus some the of the other "talent" before they were traded &
>>>>>> what
>>>>>> they
>>>>>> demanded.
>>
>>>>>> Straka - $4 to LA - $4.35 mil
>>>>>> Kovy - $4.25 to NYR - $4.6 1st yr, $6.6 the 2nd
>>>>>> Lang - $2.9 to Wash. - $5 mil
>>>>>> Kaspar - $1.6 to Colorado - $1.2, then to NYR - $4.1- Hide quoted
>>>>>> text -- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text
>>>>>> - >> Stay informed about: MARIO WAS A WASHED-UP SUCKHOLE LOSER |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|