Welcome to HockeyForumz.com!
FAQFAQ   SearchSearch      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log in/Register/PasswordLog in/Register/Password

Rules

  
   Hockey Forums (Home) -> Philadelphia Flyers RSS
Next:  Philadelphia Flyers: Sim done for the year  
Author Message
neon leon

External


Since: Apr 22, 2006
Posts: 46



(Msg. 1) Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:27 pm
Post subject: Rules
Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>phila-flyers (more info?)
Shouldn't a dive negate the initial penalty.

 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
Cordovero

External


Since: Oct 13, 2006
Posts: 36



(Msg. 2) Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Rules [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
I think I'm actually one of the few guys who doesn't see a contradiction
here. I think a dive is "enhancement" but that doesn't mean the original
action wasn't illegal.

There are so many non-penalties (like the whole horizontal stick thing) that
are more problematic than this one...

C

"neon leon" <f.mail.DeleteThis@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:w8ednWF3FJtpmonanZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com...
> Shouldn't a dive negate the initial penalty.
>
>
>

 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
Loomer

External


Since: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 4



(Msg. 3) Posted: Mon Oct 15, 2007 11:14 pm
Post subject: Re: Rules [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"neon leon" <f.mail DeleteThis @comcast.net> wrote in message
news:w8ednWF3FJtpmonanZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com...
> Shouldn't a dive negate the initial penalty.

Shouldn't beating a dead horse be negated? This has been going on ever since
the dive rule has been put into place. And every season, everyone goes nuts
when it happens. It's a lil ass backawards, but welcome to the NHL.
 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
neon leon

External


Since: Apr 22, 2006
Posts: 46



(Msg. 4) Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 8:20 am
Post subject: Re: Rules [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"Loomer" <shnickidydoo.TakeThisOut@yahoooooooooooooo.com> wrote in message
news:_qmdnb3uSpMxsYnanZ2dnUVZ_sejnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "neon leon" <f.mail.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:w8ednWF3FJtpmonanZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com...
>> Shouldn't a dive negate the initial penalty.
>
> Shouldn't beating a dead horse be negated? This has been going on ever
> since the dive rule has been put into place. And every season, everyone
> goes nuts when it happens. It's a lil ass backawards, but welcome to the
> NHL.

I believe this is the first - this year. I thought we'd get this over with,
so we could move a long.
 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
Loomer

External


Since: Jul 19, 2007
Posts: 17



(Msg. 5) Posted: Tue Oct 16, 2007 11:04 pm
Post subject: Re: Rules [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
"neon leon" <f.mail.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:iL6dnWQTbYK4MInanZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com...
>
> "Loomer" <shnickidydoo.TakeThisOut@yahoooooooooooooo.com> wrote in message
> news:_qmdnb3uSpMxsYnanZ2dnUVZ_sejnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>
>> "neon leon" <f.mail.TakeThisOut@comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:w8ednWF3FJtpmonanZ2dnUVZ_tGonZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> Shouldn't a dive negate the initial penalty.
>>
>> Shouldn't beating a dead horse be negated? This has been going on ever
>> since the dive rule has been put into place. And every season, everyone
>> goes nuts when it happens. It's a lil ass backawards, but welcome to the
>> NHL.
>
> I believe this is the first - this year. I thought we'd get this over
> with, so we could move a long.
>

Heh.. ok.
 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
Mike B

External


Since: Oct 06, 2007
Posts: 4



(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Oct 17, 2007 7:19 am
Post subject: Re: Rules [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
>I think I'm actually one of the few guys who doesn't see a contradiction
> here. I think a dive is "enhancement" but that doesn't mean the original
> action wasn't illegal.

Yes, but why not swallow the whistle and let the play continue?
 >> Stay informed about: Rules 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hockey Forums (Home) -> Philadelphia Flyers All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Page 1 of 1

 
 You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]