 |
|
 |
|
Next: The Toaster Oven!
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Jun 26, 2007 Posts: 161
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:36 am
Post subject: Shanahan Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>ny-rangers (more info?)
|
|
|
|
| 1. Slow
2. Can't score
3. Good for one awful penalty per game
Might be time to move him to the third line as a friendly grandfather
type, and get some more talent on the second line.
|
>> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 07, 2007 Posts: 103
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:36 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Bender wrote:
> 1. Slow
> 2. Can't score
> 3. Good for one awful penalty per game
>
> Might be time to move him to the third line as a friendly grandfather
> type, and get some more talent on the second line.
>
Why, is he giving out candy or something? >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 17, 2007 Posts: 371
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:36 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
wrote:
>That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
>Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
>gonna do?.
>It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
have to come up with gems like this.
Definately.
peace,
Rog >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2007 Posts: 84
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:36 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 14, 1:04?am, Roger Sherman wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
> wrote:
>
> >That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
> >Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
> >gonna do?.
> >It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
>
> See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
> have to come up with gems like this.
>
> Definately.
>
> peace,
>
> Rog
I think it's more a few hits from the bong too many tonight. Wigger
gonna do? My God...
So according to lommi, Gerber had nothing to do with the Sens win
tonight, the Rangers just couldn't finish.
I guess those two spectacular saves during the 5-3 were just in our
imagination. >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 10, 2007 Posts: 95
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:10 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Roger Sherman" wrote in message
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
> wrote:
>
>>That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
>>Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
>>gonna do?.
>
>
>>It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
>
>
> See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
> have to come up with gems like this.
>
> Definately.
>
> peace,
>
> Rog
Yea, those 200 posts about Cullen slayed me. Comedic brilliance. >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 26, 2007 Posts: 161
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 2:45 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 13, 9:10 pm, Rckwy5 wrote:
> Shanahan's sole
> purpose on the Rangers is the PP.
Maybe you should let him know that, because he seems to think his sole
purpose is to miss empty nets and take bad penalties.
I guess that would be a dual purpose. >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 17, 2007 Posts: 371
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 8:41 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:09:47 -0700, Rckwy5 wrote:
>On Oct 14, 1:04?am, Roger Sherman wrote:
>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
>> >Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
>> >gonna do?.
>> >It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
>>
>> See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
>> have to come up with gems like this.
>>
>> Definately.
>>
>> peace,
>>
>> Rog
>
>I think it's more a few hits from the bong too many tonight. Wigger
>gonna do? My God...
That one...was special.
>
>So according to lommi, Gerber had nothing to do with the Sens win
>tonight, the Rangers just couldn't finish.
>
>I guess those two spectacular saves during the 5-3 were just in our
>imagination.
peace,
Rog >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jul 01, 2007 Posts: 113
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 11:00 am
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
IommiRULES wrote:
>
> "Roger Sherman" wrote in message
>
>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
>>> Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
>>> gonna do?.
>>
>>
>>> It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
>>
>>
>> See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
>> have to come up with gems like this.
>>
>> Definately.
>>
>> peace,
>>
>> Rog
>
>
> Yea, those 200 posts about Cullen slayed me. Comedic brilliance.
There was no comedy. THAT was commentating, and cheering for the best
guy on your silly team. >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jan 17, 2007 Posts: 371
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 12:11 pm
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Sun, 14 Oct 2007 11:00:17 -0400, Leon
wrote:
>IommiRULES wrote:
>>
>> "Roger Sherman" wrote in message
>>
>>> On Sat, 13 Oct 2007 23:52:14 -0400, "IommiRULES"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> That failed 5 on 3 was definately annoying.
>>>> Yea the team has caught a bad case of Blair Bettitus, but whats a wigger
>>>> gonna do?.
>>>
>>>
>>>> It's not like The Baby food guy HAD to stand on his head,
>>>
>>>
>>> See, Keith? You're wrong. Imagine the sense of humor you'd have to
>>> have to come up with gems like this.
>>>
>>> Definately.
>>>
>>> peace,
>>>
>>> Rog
>>
>>
>> Yea, those 200 posts about Cullen slayed me. Comedic brilliance.
>
>There was no comedy. THAT was commentating, and cheering for the best
>guy on your silly team.
Thank you, Leon.
peace,
Rog >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Jun 01, 2007 Posts: 62
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Shanahan [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 13, 9:36 pm, Bender wrote:
> 1. Slow
> 2. Can't score
> 3. Good for one awful penalty per game
>
> Might be time to move him to the third line as a friendly grandfather
> type
Brenden as a blueshirted Wilfred Brimley. Brilliant! >> Stay informed about: Shanahan |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Avery and Shanahan in a brawl - A verbal brawl. A verbal brawl made up of jokes. http://rangers.lohudblogs.com/2007/11/19/more-shanny-2/ ---- Shanahan opened the Scouting Report and showed it to Avery. “Look at this kid,” Shanahan said. “You would have been terrified of him.”....
Shanahan close to new deal with Rangers - From today's NY Post.... The Rangers and Brendan Shanahan are on the verge of completing a one- year deal, with the club seeking league approval on the structure of the bonuses that will be included in the 38-year-old winger's contract, The Post ha...
Anaheim in 6, Ottawa in 6 - And the Ducks take home the Cup.
How was that any different.... - How was that waved-off goal in Buffalo any different than the one in game 1 against the Rangers? Why did that one count, and this one didn't? By the way, VS. is absolutely terrible. Joe Beninati? Why don't they just get Rick Jeanerette or some other....
Scary good - More "scary" than "good". |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|