 |
|
 |
|
Next: Wellwood?
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2007 Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 11:19 am
Post subject: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>mtl-canadiens (more info?)
|
|
|
Poking around the stats sheets for a possible trade partner for Montreal
to land a solid d-man, only a couple stand out.
One is Florida and Bouwmeester. He'd be a great pick-up, but virtually
every other contending team is thinking the same way. His price would be
extreme and then he's either have to be offered a huge contract, or he
may walk at season's end. So there's a lot of negatives. Then there's the
fact Florida is competing for 8th. It's unlikely they'll want to weaken
their team anytime soon.
So after poking around the bottom dwelling team I notice Edmonton. Here's
a team that can't score but has 3 d-men in their top 5 in scoring. In
other words, here's a team that could trade a d-man for a forward or two.
Now, Souray is one of those 3. He's out. Visnovsky is another. He has a
huge contract (5.6 million cap hit) for 4 more years. With all our
pending UFA's, I don't think we want that big contract. However, Gilbert
is only 25, scoring at about a point ever two games, which is just
slightly better than last season. Here's his scouting report.
http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/players/Tom_Gilbert
In other words, he sounds like a very good #3-#4, a good guy to pair with
Hamrlik. He's young, so not much of a cap hit. So what the Habs could do
is try and pull off the rarest of trades. A good, old-fashioned hockey
trade which has nothing to do with contracts and age, and more to do with
skill of the players and need.
So here's why Higgins name keeps coming up in trade rumours, because he
certainly would fit a need for Edmonton, but he has not made himself
indespensible to the Habs line-up. I certainly think these 2 could be key
parts in a trade. I'd need to know more about Gilbert. He'd have to be a
decent upgrade to Gorges to be worth it.
Conversely, Latendresse and a pick or prospect like Maxwell, but I doubt
that would get it done. Latendresse and O'Byrne? Well, you never know. If
they were in need of size, they might be intrigued by their upside, and
minimize their downside.
Anyway, I like the look of Edmonton as a trade partner. A glut of d-man
who can put up points, and two of them with long, hard-to-move contracts
makes Gilbert a possible commodity tyhat can be bought without a premium
price. The key is to scout and discover if he's the good puck mover the
scouting report states, or if he's really just a very average d-man.
Marty >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 24, 2007 Posts: 402
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 5:59 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
I don't think of Gilbert as being especially good in the puck-moving
sense. He's ok there. And ok on the point. And pretty robust in his
own end. I think of him as a guy that can basically play ok in any
facet, and it's the summation of all those oks that actually makes him
a very good young player overall. Most players have strengths offset
by weaknesses, but I think of Gilbert as a guy whose weaknesses are
pretty hard to determine.
But I don't think of him as being particularly likely to be available
either. I don't know why the Oilers would trade him. Good young
defensemen must be the highest market-value commodities out there,
relative to their actual on-ice impact.
The presumptive pricetags for guys like Bouwemeester scare me.
I think there are a few guys around who may be essentially free to
acquire, surplus players who are surplus for good reason, but maybe in
a new situation they'd have something to show. Brent Sopel and Tom
Preissing seem to be in that category right now. They're free because
of their contracts, though. I don't see Gainey (or any other GM these
days) gambling with that kind of money.
I guess there will be some impending-UFA types who go on the rental
market when the pack separates clearly enough on which teams are
buyers and sellars. The rental market doesn't strike me as a great
place to get a good deal, however.
I don't know. It's getting harder to predict or even suggest moves
these days. It wouldn't surprise me though if our best option ended
up being just sticking with what we have. Gorges has elevated himself
into a viable #4 NHL defenseman by the standards of the rest of the
league IMHO. Bouillon is a viable bottom-pairing guy. Brisebois,
much as it hurts to say it, is probably also playing at a viable
bottom-pairing level compared to the rest of the league. We're
vulnerable if any of our top-3 get hurt again... but I guess, who
isn't? It would be nice to have another good defenseman. I guess
I'll be pleasantly surprised if it turns out that we can find a way to
get one at a price that I'd be comfortable with, however.
l8r,
Gerry >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 04, 2004 Posts: 269
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:25 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
In Gerry writes:
>I don't think of Gilbert as being especially good in the puck-moving
>sense. He's ok there. And ok on the point. And pretty robust in his
>own end. I think of him as a guy that can basically play ok in any
>facet, and it's the summation of all those oks that actually makes him
>a very good young player overall. Most players have strengths offset
>by weaknesses, but I think of Gilbert as a guy whose weaknesses are
>pretty hard to determine.
>But I don't think of him as being particularly likely to be available
>either. I don't know why the Oilers would trade him. Good young
>defensemen must be the highest market-value commodities out there,
>relative to their actual on-ice impact.
>The presumptive pricetags for guys like Bouwemeester scare me.
>I think there are a few guys around who may be essentially free to
>acquire, surplus players who are surplus for good reason, but maybe in
>a new situation they'd have something to show. Brent Sopel and Tom
>Preissing seem to be in that category right now. They're free because
>of their contracts, though. I don't see Gainey (or any other GM these
>days) gambling with that kind of money.
>I guess there will be some impending-UFA types who go on the rental
>market when the pack separates clearly enough on which teams are
>buyers and sellars. The rental market doesn't strike me as a great
>place to get a good deal, however.
>I don't know. It's getting harder to predict or even suggest moves
>these days. It wouldn't surprise me though if our best option ended
>up being just sticking with what we have. Gorges has elevated himself
>into a viable #4 NHL defenseman by the standards of the rest of the
>league IMHO. Bouillon is a viable bottom-pairing guy. Brisebois,
>much as it hurts to say it, is probably also playing at a viable
>bottom-pairing level compared to the rest of the league. We're
>vulnerable if any of our top-3 get hurt again... but I guess, who
>isn't? It would be nice to have another good defenseman. I guess
>I'll be pleasantly surprised if it turns out that we can find a way to
>get one at a price that I'd be comfortable with, however.
>l8r,
>Gerry
Especially with the positive development of Josh Gorges, I do not think
that the Habs can get something much better with a price acceptable.
- Lauri Tarkkonen >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2007 Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2008 9:47 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
(in reply to Gerry)
I agree good, young d-men are in strong demand, but a particlar team's
demand for something is relative to their own supply. With Souray and
Visnovsky, they have their #1 and #2 d-men. They've also committed a ton
of money to them, so they are unlikely to move either. Having Gilbert as
a 3rd would be ideal for a team that could
a) Score
and
b) Not be a bottom dwelling team
For the Oilers, this isn't the case.
See, the Oilers can't look at their current configration and say to
themselves, "No thanks Gainey, we like where we are right now. We're
building around a strong defence." That's because the Oilers aren't
really in a rebuilding stage. They are generally supposed to be in at
least a competitive stage right now, which they are not. They are great
defensively, but struggle on offense. To me, there is a trade to be made
there. I mean, from the Habs perspective, there is no need to get rid of
Higgins either. Good young player, 3-time 20-goal scorer, high energy,
good character. However, when is come to guys who can score goals at
forward, the team has plenty of guys who would not look out of place on
the top 2 lines. Right now, a bigger issue is making sure to get it out
of their own zone with a crisp pass to start-up the offence.
Pulling on guy in the league out of the hat for a trade is pretty
unlikely. About the only time I nailed one was when I said we should send
Theeodore for Aeibisher just to get rid of him. However, Edmonton does
seem like a real good fit as a trade parnter, especially since they have
a new GM who perhaps would like to put a stamp on the team. If he and
Gainey would be willing to swap good young player for good young players
they'd get around the major stumbling block in trades these days and that
is the cap implications.
Marty >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 24, 2007 Posts: 402
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 6:15 am
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Well, I think they have all sorts of offensive options up front, even
if they aren't all scoring where the Oilers would like them to. And
if a team is satisfied with having a #1 and #2 defenseman, why
shouldn't we be looking to trade Hamrlik? Why are we looking for
another one? Add Souray's injury history on top of that. And from
any time I've seen Gilbert's name thrown out in trade proposals on
other boards, Oilers fans have been pretty quick to get their backs up
and totally deny the chance of his availability. Staios and Smid seem
to be the blueliners who might be available there, not Gilbert. I
think you'd be wasting your time trying to build trade ideas
predicated on his availability. But of course, that's just me, and
who really knows. Doesn't seem to make sense to me, but lots of
things happen in the NHL that don't seem to make sense to me.
l8r,
Gerry >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 17, 2007 Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:24 am
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 22, 9:15 am, Gerry wrote:
> Well, I think they have all sorts of offensive options up front, even
> if they aren't all scoring where the Oilers would like them to. And
> if a team is satisfied with having a #1 and #2 defenseman, why
> shouldn't we be looking to trade Hamrlik? Why are we looking for
> another one? Add Souray's injury history on top of that. And from
> any time I've seen Gilbert's name thrown out in trade proposals on
> other boards, Oilers fans have been pretty quick to get their backs up
> and totally deny the chance of his availability. Staios and Smid seem
> to be the blueliners who might be available there, not Gilbert. I
> think you'd be wasting your time trying to build trade ideas
> predicated on his availability. But of course, that's just me, and
> who really knows. Doesn't seem to make sense to me, but lots of
> things happen in the NHL that don't seem to make sense to me.
>
> l8r,
> Gerry
Barring any weak GM willing to give up a player who could solve
Montreal's PP problems (In return for current pressbox residents) I
think Montreal should try to get either Weber or Carle into the lineup
sooner then later. Have a quick evaluation now to have a better idea
at the trade deadline who to pick up. Montreal should not give up
prospects for rental players, unless the incoming player still has a
number of years left on a current contract to avoid seeing both the
prospect and the UFA helping another team next year. >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 24, 2007 Posts: 402
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 9:36 am
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 22, 11:24 am, Chuck wrote:
> Barring any weak GM willing to give up a player who could solve
> Montreal's PP problems (In return for current pressbox residents) I
> think Montreal should try to get either Weber or Carle into the lineup
> sooner then later. Have a quick evaluation now to have a better idea
> at the trade deadline who to pick up. Montreal should not give up
> prospects for rental players, unless the incoming player still has a
> number of years left on a current contract to avoid seeing both the
> prospect and the UFA helping another team next year.
I think that ship has sailed now with Komisarek's return. A mini-
evaluation would have been nice, but until somebody else gets hurt, I
don't think it's something we could even realistically hope for.
Giving up prospects for rental players is still IMHO predicated on the
team's ability to truly number itself amongst the Eastern Conference
contenders this year. To date, I don't think we could so number the
team, not with any confidence anyway. Pittsburgh and Washington,
Boston, the Flyers and Devils... if there is any separation in the
pack, well, I don't see the Habs making a strong case to lead the
charge in that respect. Which doesn't mean I don't think it could
ever happen. We have all of January and February still to go. And
who knows what will happen in those two months. If the team gets
healthy, stays healthy, and starts playing consistently to its
potential, then perhaps the idea of being a serious contender and
going out to look for some rental acquisitions will start to appeal
more again. For now, I'd hold off for sure.
l8r,
Gerry >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 17, 2007 Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:11 am
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 22, 12:36 pm, Gerry wrote:
> On Dec 22, 11:24 am, Chuck wrote:
>
> > Barring any weak GM willing to give up a player who could solve
> > Montreal's PP problems (In return for current pressbox residents) I
> > think Montreal should try to get either Weber or Carle into the lineup
> > sooner then later. Have a quick evaluation now to have a better idea
> > at the trade deadline who to pick up. Montreal should not give up
> > prospects for rental players, unless the incoming player still has a
> > number of years left on a current contract to avoid seeing both the
> > prospect and the UFA helping another team next year.
>
> I think that ship has sailed now with Komisarek's return. A mini-
> evaluation would have been nice, but until somebody else gets hurt, I
> don't think it's something we could even realistically hope for.
>
> Giving up prospects for rental players is still IMHO predicated on the
> team's ability to truly number itself amongst the Eastern Conference
> contenders this year. To date, I don't think we could so number the
> team, not with any confidence anyway. Pittsburgh and Washington,
> Boston, the Flyers and Devils... if there is any separation in the
> pack, well, I don't see the Habs making a strong case to lead the
> charge in that respect. Which doesn't mean I don't think it could
> ever happen. We have all of January and February still to go. And
> who knows what will happen in those two months. If the team gets
> healthy, stays healthy, and starts playing consistently to its
> potential, then perhaps the idea of being a serious contender and
> going out to look for some rental acquisitions will start to appeal
> more again. For now, I'd hold off for sure.
>
> l8r,
> Gerry
Compared with his past play Brisebois has not been that bad lately.
Compared to what is needed to push this team higher, Brisebois needs
to be put back into his "seventh defenceman" role. They have tied
O`Bryne to the pressbox, it looks like he will only get back into the
line-up via no other choice. That is a waste of a position. Will they
warehouse him there for most of the rest of the season, or do they
have a plan to get him back on the ice anytime soon? Do they have the
confidence to have both Brisebois and O'Bryne in the lineup at the
same time? If not it will be difficult to rest any other defenceman.
If the player occupying O'Brynes position was a regular then Brisebois
could sub in for other defencemen that need rest, basically the role
he was intended for. So how long do they wait, carrying a player in
the pressbox, who they have no confidence in vice bringing someone up,
to see if they could do better? >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 19, 2007 Posts: 44
|
(Msg. 9) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 10:47 am
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Gerry wrote in
6b9a307f90e8 RemoveThis @n33g2000pri.googlegroups.com:
> Well, I think they have all sorts of offensive options up front, even
> if they aren't all scoring where the Oilers would like them to. And
> if a team is satisfied with having a #1 and #2 defenseman, why
> shouldn't we be looking to trade Hamrlik?
Well, I think Hamrlik is our real #2, not our #3, for first things.
Secondly, this team isn't the lowest scoring team in its conference, so
trading a d-man for offence doesn't fit a need. Thirdly, this team
doesn't seem to have a lopsided number of d-men in it's top 5 in scoring
(3 of 5 for Edmonton).
> Why are we looking for
> another one? Add Souray's injury history on top of that.
Well, that is true, but sometime GM's live-in-the-moment, and might not
look past the fact that Souray is playing great right now to realize his
play is often erratic, and his injuries frequent. If you think GM's
aren't silly enough to ignore those facts, I offer as evidence Souray's
contract, and his stats from last season.
And from
> any time I've seen Gilbert's name thrown out in trade proposals on
> other boards, Oilers fans have been pretty quick to get their backs up
> and totally deny the chance of his availability.
This may indeed be the case. You would know more about that.
> Staios and Smid seem
> to be the blueliners who might be available there, not Gilbert.
Well, I'm sure Dandenault was "available" to at some point, but as surely
as we'd laugh at a proposal to trade, say, Begin and Kostopolous for
Gilbert, we'd also laugh at an Edmonton proposal to trade Staios and Smid
for Higgins. Trying to swing a big trade means two team being willing to
swap good players, not just trade their potential cast-offs. Edmonton
will not likey get any real offensive talent for 5th or 6th or 7th d-men.
I
> think you'd be wasting your time trying to build trade ideas
> predicated on his availability. But of course, that's just me, and
> who really knows. Doesn't seem to make sense to me, but lots of
> things happen in the NHL that don't seem to make sense to me.
I'm just throwing it out there for fun. People speculate about Boumeester
all the time, I was just trying to identify another team with a suplus of
good d-men, and with a need. Edmonton was the best fit with it's pop-gun
offence, terrible current standing, and abundence of point producing d-
man but lack of point producing forwards.
Marty >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 24, 2007 Posts: 402
|
(Msg. 10) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:40 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 22, 1:11 pm, Chuck wrote:
> Compared with his past play Brisebois has not been that bad lately.
> Compared to what is needed to push this team higher, Brisebois needs
> to be put back into his "seventh defenceman" role.
Ok, I will go along with that, but...
> They have tied
> O`Bryne to the pressbox, it looks like he will only get back into the
> line-up via no other choice. That is a waste of a position. Will they
> warehouse him there for most of the rest of the season, or do they
> have a plan to get him back on the ice anytime soon? Do they have the
> confidence to have both Brisebois and O'Bryne in the lineup at the
> same time? If not it will be difficult to rest any other defenceman.
> If the player occupying O'Brynes position was a regular then Brisebois
> could sub in for other defencemen that need rest, basically the role
> he was intended for. So how long do they wait, carrying a player in
> the pressbox, who they have no confidence in vice bringing someone up,
> to see if they could do better?
Well you have to have a defenseman available in the pressbox. What if
one gets hurt in the pre-game skate or on a long road trip. You have
to have 7, so by definition, you actually want to have one guy
sitting. I don't see where it hurts to have that one be O'Byrne, if
he's not playing better than the #6 guy. And I think they have made
the very informed judgement that there is nobody in Hamilton who is
better than O'Byrne. Which is likely a very reasonable judgement,
given what O'Byrne has achieved already at that level vs. what any of
the alternative options have.
There is a separate argument to this which says maybe you just want
O'Byrne to play more minutes to promote his development, which
ultimately helps us down the road (presumably). In that case, there
is nothing gained by promoting an actual (and less experienced)
prospect like Carle or Weber to fill the mandatory #7 spot. Perhaps
Henry or Belle would be the suitable recalls relative to that
argument. So that the guy you have sitting in the pressbox isn't
using up development time.
Although to me, the reason they have O'Byrne up is because he's
already put in his time in Hamilton, proved he's ready for the next
step, and they even gave him the 1-way salary years on his contract as
an offshoot of that evaluation. For that player, there may indeed be
very little left to prove in the AHL, and practising in the NHL and
getting even sparing use might be as good as anything else.
No biggie either way to me. I think the potential for external
additions is the bigger question. If that happens, that may be
O'Byrne's ticket to some big-minute development time in the AHL
again.
l8r,
Gerry >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Apr 17, 2007 Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 11) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:36 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Dec 22, 3:40 pm, Gerry wrote:
> On Dec 22, 1:11 pm, Chuck wrote:
>
> > Compared with his past play Brisebois has not been that bad lately.
> > Compared to what is needed to push this team higher, Brisebois needs
> > to be put back into his "seventh defenceman" role.
>
> Ok, I will go along with that, but...
>
> > They have tied
> > O`Bryne to the pressbox, it looks like he will only get back into the
> > line-up via no other choice. That is a waste of a position. Will they
> > warehouse him there for most of the rest of the season, or do they
> > have a plan to get him back on the ice anytime soon? Do they have the
> > confidence to have both Brisebois and O'Bryne in the lineup at the
> > same time? If not it will be difficult to rest any other defenceman.
> > If the player occupying O'Brynes position was a regular then Brisebois
> > could sub in for other defencemen that need rest, basically the role
> > he was intended for. So how long do they wait, carrying a player in
> > the pressbox, who they have no confidence in vice bringing someone up,
> > to see if they could do better?
>
> Well you have to have a defenseman available in the pressbox. What if
> one gets hurt in the pre-game skate or on a long road trip. You have
> to have 7, so by definition, you actually want to have one guy
> sitting. I don't see where it hurts to have that one be O'Byrne, if
> he's not playing better than the #6 guy. And I think they have made
> the very informed judgement that there is nobody in Hamilton who is
> better than O'Byrne. Which is likely a very reasonable judgement,
> given what O'Byrne has achieved already at that level vs. what any of
> the alternative options have.
>
> There is a separate argument to this which says maybe you just want
> O'Byrne to play more minutes to promote his development, which
> ultimately helps us down the road (presumably). In that case, there
> is nothing gained by promoting an actual (and less experienced)
> prospect like Carle or Weber to fill the mandatory #7 spot. Perhaps
> Henry or Belle would be the suitable recalls relative to that
> argument. So that the guy you have sitting in the pressbox isn't
> using up development time.
> Although to me, the reason they have O'Byrne up is because he's
> already put in his time in Hamilton, proved he's ready for the next
> step, and they even gave him the 1-way salary years on his contract as
> an offshoot of that evaluation. For that player, there may indeed be
> very little left to prove in the AHL, and practising in the NHL and
> getting even sparing use might be as good as anything else.
>
> No biggie either way to me. I think the potential for external
> additions is the bigger question. If that happens, that may be
> O'Byrne's ticket to some big-minute development time in the AHL
> again.
>
> l8r,
> Gerry
If they plan on making a trade to upgrade the defence then it may not
matter much what they do with O'Bryne this season. If they plan on
giving him another chance, it should be better to get him the icetime
now rather then later in the season when there is less time to work on
mistakes. If they have lost confidence in him, and do not play him,
its the coach's choice but it doesn`t help the team if they do not use
the position to look at anyone else. Same if they did bring someone up
in his spot, do they do it now before the 1/2 way point of the season
or wait till a more critical point around the deadline to make a
choice?. One of the knocks against O'Bryne is he doesn`t throw his
weight around enough, so what do they do they play Brisebois who
hardly hits anything. Just wish they had someone closer to push
Brisebois back to the sidelines. Whether it is O'Bryne or anyone else,
I hpe they can get Breezy back to being a spare again, and away from
any PP time. >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Dec 22, 2008 Posts: 2
|
(Msg. 12) Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 4:27 pm
Post subject: Re: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Chuck wrote in
Will they
> warehouse him there for most of the rest of the season, or do they
> have a plan to get him back on the ice anytime soon? Do they have the
> confidence to have both Brisebois and O'Bryne in the lineup at the
> same time? If not it will be difficult to rest any other defenceman.
> If the player occupying O'Brynes position was a regular then Brisebois
> could sub in for other defencemen that need rest, basically the role
> he was intended for. So how long do they wait, carrying a player in
> the pressbox, who they have no confidence in vice bringing someone up,
> to see if they could do better?
It doesn't much matter what role the GM signed a player for. The coach
has the option of playing the players who give the team the best chance at
winning each game. Unfortuneately for O'Byrne, he is not one of those
players right now for some reason. I think he could use a bit of
development back in Hamilton to get some big minutes and some much needed
confidence. >> Stay informed about: Tom Gilbert, d-man for Oilers - any opinions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
| Related Topics: | Oilers pick up Visnovsky from Kings - http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/2008/06/29/oilers_kings_visnovsky/ Sportsnet.ca -- The Edmonton Oilers have added a little help to their blueline just a couple of days before the free agent market opens. The Oilers sent forward Jarret Stoll and..
An interesting thought... - We're all expecting Price to rip it up in camp and turn Huet into excess baggage. But what if he doesn't? What if he and Halak are good, but not outstanding...and *Huet* is the best goalie? It gets a lot tougher for Gainey to pull the trigger on a..
What's happened to Souray? - Obviously he didn't want to return to Montreal, but if he ends up signing for 5 mill or less and doesn't go to the west coast isn't that just a little bit embarrasing for him? I think he overestimated his value some.
Tommy Non-stopoulos? - >From the Gazette: Canadiens fans will be interested in an email I received the other day from Tom Hedican, who gives his seal of approval to the Canadiens' acquisition of veteran forward Tom Kostopoulos. You might recall that Hedican played a key...
All I'm hoping... - ....is that the Habs win the Cup before 2011. Because if they don't win it by then, all the players in that draft year will have been born AFTER the Habs' last Cup. I think that's pretty much unprecedented in club history. In fact, I'm getting older. ... |
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You can edit your posts in this forum You can delete your posts in this forum You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|