Wild, Best 2 Periods

Scott Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net> wrote:
>
>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>> ran out of gas in this one.
>
>
> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
> shabby at all.
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
>
Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun DeleteThis @golfdom.com>
wrote:

>Scott Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso DeleteThis @idontknow.net> wrote:
>>
>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>
>>
>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>> shabby at all.

>>
>Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.


The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
should have won that one in regulation.

Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
Thursday game against the Stars.




- Scott Smith: scott.smith DeleteThis @iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

S. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.DeleteThis@golfdom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>
>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>> shabby at all.
>
>>>
>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>
>
> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
> should have won that one in regulation.
>
> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
> Thursday game against the Stars.
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
last night, I smell a victory.
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
wrote:

>S. Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.TakeThisOut@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>> shabby at all.
>>
>>>>
>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>
>>
>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>
>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>

>If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
>last night, I smell a victory.

I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
the season.

Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.

Go Wild!!!





- Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

S. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> S. Smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.TakeThisOut@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>>> shabby at all.
>>>>>
>>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>>
>>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>>
>>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>>
>
>> If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
>> last night, I smell a victory.
>
> I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
> division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
> they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
> the season.
>
> Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
> entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.
>
> Go Wild!!!
>
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
Dream on.
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:28:56 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun RemoveThis @golfdom.com>
wrote:

>S. Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun RemoveThis @golfdom.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun RemoveThis @golfdom.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso RemoveThis @idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>>>> shabby at all.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>>>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>>>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>>>
>>>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>>>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>>>
>>>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>>>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>>>
>>
>>> If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
>>> last night, I smell a victory.
>>
>> I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
>> division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
>> they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
>> the season.
>>
>> Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
>> entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.
>>
>> Go Wild!!!

>Dream on.


Are you still in denial that the Wild have a decent team this season?





- Scott Smith: scott.smith RemoveThis @iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

S. Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:28:56 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.DeleteThis@golfdom.com>
> wrote:
>
>> S. Smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.DeleteThis@golfdom.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.DeleteThis@golfdom.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>>>>> shabby at all.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>>>>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>>>>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>>>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>>>>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>>>>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>>>>
>>>> If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
>>>> last night, I smell a victory.
>>> I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
>>> division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
>>> they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
>>> the season.
>>>
>>> Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
>>> entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.
>>>
>>> Go Wild!!!
>
>> Dream on.
>
>
> Are you still in denial that the Wild have a decent team this season?
>
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
Absolutely not. Maybe that is because I slept at a Holiday Inn last
night. Or that Macy's is letting go 950 employees, but either way, the
Wild are playing well but I don't have enough conviction that they will
be a number 3 (ie division champs) seed.
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:56:00 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
wrote:

>S. Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:28:56 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.TakeThisOut@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all year in the
>>>>>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the 3rd. And
>>>>>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big time
>>>>>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The Wild just
>>>>>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>>>>>> shabby at all.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why Rolston
>>>>>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was a
>>>>>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>>>>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>>>>>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>>>>>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>>>>>
>>>>> If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and 2
>>>>> last night, I smell a victory.
>>>> I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
>>>> division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
>>>> they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
>>>> the season.
>>>>
>>>> Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
>>>> entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Go Wild!!!
>>
>>> Dream on.
>>
>>
>> Are you still in denial that the Wild have a decent team this season?
>>
>Absolutely not. Maybe that is because I slept at a Holiday Inn last
>night. Or that Macy's is letting go 950 employees, but either way, the
>Wild are playing well but I don't have enough conviction that they will
>be a number 3 (ie division champs) seed.


They have a better shot at being the division champs than the
Timberwolves do of getting a #1 pick via the lottery, IMO. ;-)

It almost sounds like you WANT the Wild to fold....then it will
give you more to complain about. Which is what you do best,
after all.





- Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

Wow, you two should just get a room. One thinks the Wild are going to be a
lock for the Stanley Cup and the other thinks the Wild won't even make the
playoffs. Exaggerations aside, I just don't see why one persons opinion is
better than anothers. I know golfox's hockey background and he does have
alot of hockey knowledge, and yes, he would be more of a pessimist than an
optimist, but what quailifies you to have a more appropriate opinion?
"S. Smith" <scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:2sckq35nsfanhim7sudu4p35jtrleabo7n@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:56:00 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
> wrote:
>
>>S. Smith wrote:
>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 14:28:56 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:56:04 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> S. Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 06 Feb 2008 07:25:14 -0600, Golfox <golfisfun.TakeThisOut@golfdom.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Scott Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:29:22 -0600, "Yathinkso"
>>>>>>>>> <yathinkso.TakeThisOut@idontknow.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The Wild played probably the best 2 periods they have played all
>>>>>>>>>> year in the
>>>>>>>>>> first and second periods. Too bad they lost intensity in the
>>>>>>>>>> 3rd. And
>>>>>>>>>> Johnsson / Skoula.......please retire. The Wild stepped up big
>>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>> tonight, but Johnsson and Skoula failed to pick up the pace. The
>>>>>>>>>> Wild just
>>>>>>>>>> ran out of gas in this one.
>>>>>>>>> Yes, they played great and got a point against Detroit. Not too
>>>>>>>>> shabby at all.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Man, that final goal in OT was a killer. I guess that is why
>>>>>>>> Rolston
>>>>>>>> does not play defense. I think the 2nd goal Backstrom gave up was
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> soft one. The Wild should have won the game in regulation.
>>>>>>> The Wild played a great game against the Wings. And yes, they
>>>>>>> should have won that one in regulation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should be interesting to see if the momentum carries over to the
>>>>>>> Thursday game against the Stars.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> If Lemaire can get the team motivated like they were in periods 1 and
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>> last night, I smell a victory.
>>>>> I hope so. They have been doing a good job of hanging on to that
>>>>> division lead and 3rd place in the conference for a while now, and
>>>>> they need to keep that up heading into these final two months of
>>>>> the season.
>>>>>
>>>>> Their schedule doesn't look too tough the rest of the way, so it is
>>>>> entirely doable for the Wild, IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>> Go Wild!!!
>>>
>>>> Dream on.
>>>
>>>
>>> Are you still in denial that the Wild have a decent team this season?
>>>
>>Absolutely not. Maybe that is because I slept at a Holiday Inn last
>>night. Or that Macy's is letting go 950 employees, but either way, the
>>Wild are playing well but I don't have enough conviction that they will
>>be a number 3 (ie division champs) seed.
>
>
> They have a better shot at being the division champs than the
> Timberwolves do of getting a #1 pick via the lottery, IMO. ;-)
>
> It almost sounds like you WANT the Wild to fold....then it will
> give you more to complain about. Which is what you do best,
> after all.
>
>
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:28:56 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.TakeThisOut@idontknow.net> wrote:

>Wow, you two should just get a room. One thinks the Wild are going to be a
>lock for the Stanley Cup and the other thinks the Wild won't even make the
>playoffs. Exaggerations aside, I just don't see why one persons opinion is
>better than anothers. I know golfox's hockey background and he does have
>a lot of hockey knowledge, and yes, he would be more of a pessimist than an
>optimist, but what quailifies you to have a more appropriate opinion?

His opinions are fine, and more than welcome.

His constant bitching, complaining, and trashing on the Wild
gets old real fast, though. Especially this season, when the
Wild have more than held their own in the conference so far.

He wrote them off at the beginning of the season, and he just
won't admit he was wrong, or that the Wild are actually a
pretty damn good team this season...a fact that most Wild
fans know already.



- Scott Smith: scott.smith.TakeThisOut@iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

And who just posted that something about the Wild's 2 best periods. His
posting seems balanced...good and bad. I think you only want to post good.
You were probably upset when the fans were booing Skoula. This is all part
of being a fan. And I agree, I was only able to catch the first period, but
that was a great period. I am surprised the were outshot so badly in the
3rd.

Perhaps you have just become intolerant of his postings, no matter the
content.

"Scott Smith" <scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:uohkq31h48aplof7skeoqemal39pj9i1ah@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:28:56 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Wow, you two should just get a room. One thinks the Wild are going to be
>>a
>>lock for the Stanley Cup and the other thinks the Wild won't even make the
>>playoffs. Exaggerations aside, I just don't see why one persons opinion
>>is
>>better than anothers. I know golfox's hockey background and he does have
>>a lot of hockey knowledge, and yes, he would be more of a pessimist than
>>an
>>optimist, but what quailifies you to have a more appropriate opinion?
>
> His opinions are fine, and more than welcome.
>
> His constant bitching, complaining, and trashing on the Wild
> gets old real fast, though. Especially this season, when the
> Wild have more than held their own in the conference so far.
>
> He wrote them off at the beginning of the season, and he just
> won't admit he was wrong, or that the Wild are actually a
> pretty damn good team this season...a fact that most Wild
> fans know already.
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:05:28 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net> wrote:

>"Scott Smith" <scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com> wrote in message
>news:uohkq31h48aplof7skeoqemal39pj9i1ah@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:28:56 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.DeleteThis@idontknow.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Wow, you two should just get a room. One thinks the Wild are going to be
>>>a
>>>lock for the Stanley Cup and the other thinks the Wild won't even make the
>>>playoffs. Exaggerations aside, I just don't see why one persons opinion
>>>is
>>>better than anothers. I know golfox's hockey background and he does have
>>>a lot of hockey knowledge, and yes, he would be more of a pessimist than
>>>an
>>>optimist, but what quailifies you to have a more appropriate opinion?
>>
>> His opinions are fine, and more than welcome.
>>
>> His constant bitching, complaining, and trashing on the Wild
>> gets old real fast, though. Especially this season, when the
>> Wild have more than held their own in the conference so far.
>>
>> He wrote them off at the beginning of the season, and he just
>> won't admit he was wrong, or that the Wild are actually a
>> pretty damn good team this season...a fact that most Wild
>> fans know already.
>>

>And who just posted that something about the Wild's 2 best periods.

You did...or did you forget already? You started this thread.

>His posting seems balanced...good and bad.

Is he posting using your pseudonym?

>I think you only want to post good.

Not at all. I can see both good and bad

>You were probably upset when the fans were booing Skoula. This is all part
>of being a fan.

Yes it is, and if I had been at the game I would have booed Skoula as
well. His playing has stunk most of this season.

>And I agree, I was only able to catch the first period, but
>that was a great period. I am surprised the were outshot so badly in the
>3rd.

Agreed.

>Perhaps you have just become intolerant of his postings, no matter the
>content.

Nope. Only when it's nothing but complaining and whining.



- Scott Smith: scott.smith.DeleteThis@iphouse.com
MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods 

No, I can't touch his computer.

And I kinda liked my little comment...golfoxes posting....fair and balanced.

"Scott Smith" <scott.smith.RemoveThis@iphouse.com> wrote in message
news:s4nkq392i0fbok04sfhsafpj1doi6bg4om@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 18:05:28 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.RemoveThis@idontknow.net>
> wrote:
>
>>"Scott Smith" <scott.smith.RemoveThis@iphouse.com> wrote in message
>>news:uohkq31h48aplof7skeoqemal39pj9i1ah@4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:28:56 -0600, "Yathinkso" <yathinkso.RemoveThis@idontknow.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Wow, you two should just get a room. One thinks the Wild are going to
>>>>be
>>>>a
>>>>lock for the Stanley Cup and the other thinks the Wild won't even make
>>>>the
>>>>playoffs. Exaggerations aside, I just don't see why one persons opinion
>>>>is
>>>>better than anothers. I know golfox's hockey background and he does
>>>>have
>>>>a lot of hockey knowledge, and yes, he would be more of a pessimist than
>>>>an
>>>>optimist, but what quailifies you to have a more appropriate opinion?
>>>
>>> His opinions are fine, and more than welcome.
>>>
>>> His constant bitching, complaining, and trashing on the Wild
>>> gets old real fast, though. Especially this season, when the
>>> Wild have more than held their own in the conference so far.
>>>
>>> He wrote them off at the beginning of the season, and he just
>>> won't admit he was wrong, or that the Wild are actually a
>>> pretty damn good team this season...a fact that most Wild
>>> fans know already.
>>>
>
>>And who just posted that something about the Wild's 2 best periods.
>
> You did...or did you forget already? You started this thread.
>
>>His posting seems balanced...good and bad.
>
> Is he posting using your pseudonym?
>
>>I think you only want to post good.
>
> Not at all. I can see both good and bad
>
>>You were probably upset when the fans were booing Skoula. This is all
>>part
>>of being a fan.
>
> Yes it is, and if I had been at the game I would have booed Skoula as
> well. His playing has stunk most of this season.
>
>>And I agree, I was only able to catch the first period, but
>>that was a great period. I am surprised the were outshot so badly in the
>>3rd.
>
> Agreed.
>
>>Perhaps you have just become intolerant of his postings, no matter the
>>content.
>
> Nope. Only when it's nothing but complaining and whining.
>
>
>
> - Scott Smith: scott.smith.RemoveThis@iphouse.com
> MySpace: http://www.myspace.com/choppersmith
>
>
 >> Stay informed about: Wild, Best 2 Periods