|
Next: Wasn't Dallas in Crease?
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:00 am
Post subject: calls
Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>vanc-canucks (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:12 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-02-05 19:00:25 -0800, Otterbum <cherylandsilver.DeleteThis@telus.net> said:
> whats with all the calls against..?
You do something stupid, you get a penalty. And sometimes even when you
don't do something stupid.
These calls seem to have been a mix of the two.
But a couple of them were Cooke, and maybe I just missed the stupid
thing he did. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 25, 2007
Posts: 588
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:27 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Steven Fisher wrote:
> On 2008-02-05 19:00:25 -0800, Otterbum <cherylandsilver DeleteThis @telus.net> said:
>
>> whats with all the calls against..?
>
> You do something stupid, you get a penalty. And sometimes even when you
> don't do something stupid.
>
> These calls seem to have been a mix of the two.
>
> But a couple of them were Cooke, and maybe I just missed the stupid
> thing he did.
>
Cooke's a prick. His reputation precedes him and he doesn't get the
benefit of the doubt. Occasionally he's going to be put in the box
unfairly because of that.
Scott >> Stay informed about: calls |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Apr 14, 2007
Posts: 11
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:33 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Scotty wrote:
> Steven Fisher wrote:
>> On 2008-02-05 19:00:25 -0800, Otterbum <cherylandsilver.TakeThisOut@telus.net> said:
>>
>>> whats with all the calls against..?
>>
>> You do something stupid, you get a penalty. And sometimes even when
>> you don't do something stupid.
>>
>> These calls seem to have been a mix of the two.
>>
>> But a couple of them were Cooke, and maybe I just missed the stupid
>> thing he did.
>>
>
> Cooke's a prick. His reputation precedes him and he doesn't get the
> benefit of the doubt. Occasionally he's going to be put in the box
> unfairly because of that.
>
> Scott
yeah but this ain't the Cook show.. its a team professional sport, with
rules and such. The ref's not liking Cook or his reputation has nothing
to do with it, i'm trying to watch hockey. >> Stay informed about: calls |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:40 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-02-05 19:27:05 -0800, Scotty <Lah.RemoveThis@de.da> said:
> Cooke's a prick. His reputation precedes him and he doesn't get the
> benefit of the doubt. Occasionally he's going to be put in the box
> unfairly because of that.
Even so, I'm sure he gets away with more than he's phantom called for. >> Stay informed about: calls |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 04, 2004
Posts: 200
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:41 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On 2008-02-05 19:33:30 -0800, Otterbum <cherylandsilver RemoveThis @telus.net> said:
> yeah but this ain't the Cook show.. its a team professional sport, with
> rules and such. The ref's not liking Cook or his reputation has nothing
> to do with it, i'm trying to watch hockey.
Unless you managed to watch Cooke from end to end (which would be
tough, given that TV didn't show it), you can probably safely assume he
did whatever they're calling him for. >> Stay informed about: calls |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: May 25, 2007
Posts: 588
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:01 am
Post subject: Re: calls [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
Otterbum wrote:
> Scotty wrote:
>> Steven Fisher wrote:
>>> On 2008-02-05 19:00:25 -0800, Otterbum <cherylandsilver RemoveThis @telus.net> said:
>>>
>>>> whats with all the calls against..?
>>>
>>> You do something stupid, you get a penalty. And sometimes even when
>>> you don't do something stupid.
>>>
>>> These calls seem to have been a mix of the two.
>>>
>>> But a couple of them were Cooke, and maybe I just missed the stupid
>>> thing he did.
>>>
>>
>> Cooke's a prick. His reputation precedes him and he doesn't get the
>> benefit of the doubt. Occasionally he's going to be put in the box
>> unfairly because of that.
>>
>> Scott
>
> yeah but this ain't the Cook show.. its a team professional sport, with
> rules and such. The ref's not liking Cook or his reputation has nothing
> to do with it, i'm trying to watch hockey.
I didn't say it was right. It is what it is.
Scott >> Stay informed about: calls |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
FAQ
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
