So, I think...

On 26 Apr 2007 11:01:43 -0700, Freedom Elz
wrote:

>On Apr 25, 11:52 am, xpene....RemoveThis@earthlink.net wrote:
>> On 25 Apr 2007 08:34:59 -0700, Freedom Elz
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Apr 23, 1:31 am, Thomas wrote:
>>
>> >> BTW, I was obviously wrong in picking the Flames to win in 6. The Flames
>> >> have a lot of work to do this offseason, that is for sure.
>>
>> >They clearly quit on Playfair.
>>
>> 1) Nashville will win the Central
>> 2) Hasek will pull his groin in February
>> 3) Detroit will lose to # 8 seed in the first round.
>> 4) Colorado got screwed
>>
>> What other excuses you got up your sleeve?
>
>
>Didn't you project that Cleary would get 30 goals?

25
>
>So what?
>
>Its a prediction, that's all.

xpenenyx.RemoveThis@earthlink.net wrote:
> On 26 Apr 2007 11:01:43 -0700, Freedom Elz
> wrote:
>
>> On Apr 25, 11:52 am, xpene....RemoveThis@earthlink.net wrote:
>>> On 25 Apr 2007 08:34:59 -0700, Freedom Elz
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Apr 23, 1:31 am, Thomas wrote:
>>>>> BTW, I was obviously wrong in picking the Flames to win in 6. The Flames
>>>>> have a lot of work to do this offseason, that is for sure.
>>>> They clearly quit on Playfair.
>>> 1) Nashville will win the Central
>>> 2) Hasek will pull his groin in February
>>> 3) Detroit will lose to # 8 seed in the first round.
>>> 4) Colorado got screwed
>>>
>>> What other excuses you got up your sleeve?
>>
>> Didn't you project that Cleary would get 30 goals?
>
> 25

<doug>

HAHAHAHA!!!

YOU WERE WRONG!
YOU WERE WRONG!

Hey everyone, look at Doug! HE WAS WRONG!

HAHAHAHA!!!
He made a prediction, and it was WRONG!!!!

</doug>

Yeah, I don't see what the point of *this* is either. Your schtick
though, so I guess if you get it and it works for you, so be it.

-Thomas