"Mario and Carole" <vanhalenmcs DeleteThis @sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:xgXmc.99578$ZJ5.2100841@news20.bellglobal.com...
>> Newsflash!!!! The Flames, Lightning and Sharks are all in the bottom
tier
> of payrolls in the NHL so it is possible to have a winner in a small
market.
But they haven't won a thing yet, Mario. And there is still one team left
in the playoffs with a large payroll. Yes, the Flames, Lightning, and
Sharks are contending right now, but that doesn't mean they'll do that every
year if the current economic system remains in place in the NHL. Why?
Because the time will come under the current system when those teams' key
players will become too expensive to keep or do you seriously think that
Iginla will still be a Flame after his current contract expires, not to
mention a guy like St.Louis? The Wild and Ducks were right in the thick of
things last year- this year they booked early tee times. And neither of
them won the Cup last year, in case you've forgotten.
> Your're one of those Oil fans that accepts mediocrity, scrape into the
> postseason and get hammered by Dallas and that in your mind that
constitutes
> a successful season.
No, I'm a fan who understands the economic reality of the league and thus
can understand WHY my team is having a difficult time competing. Do I like
watching the Oilers bow out early? No. But do I understand WHY it happens?
Yes. The real question is: do YOU understand? I don't think so.
> Can we maybe aspire as an organization to be a bit more? No doubt
injuries,
> holdouts and player inconsistency is going to effect a hockey club during
the course of > an 82 game schedule but playing only half a season the way
the Oilers did this year is > the bigger problem.
No, the bigger problem is how the Oilers have continually had to adjust to
losses of talent in their roster. No one can rationally argue that this
team got better when it lost Carter, Ninnimaa, Marchant, and Comrie before
the last season started. Inconsistency is the hallmark of any young team-
thankfully, Lowe actually had the talent flow go in the opposite direction
with Nedved but if he's gone it won't matter anyway come next season. Go
back to my argument on the need for a cap when the CBA comes up for renewal
next year....
> Look at the strides both Calgary and San Jose made this year coming off
> miserable seasons a year ago. Defensive accountability and solid
specialty
> team play would translate the Oiler 89 point seaon this year to 4 or 5th
in
> the conference. The team scored enough goals this year to win we just
gave
> up way too many.
5-on-5, the Oilers were just fine defensively (121 goals against 5-on-5,
good enough to be 14th overall). What hurt them was their special teams on
both sides but especially on the PK which is exactly where Marchant's
departure hurt them the most (the previous season the Oilers' PK was 19th
overall and year before it was 12th overall). Yes, the Oilers gave up more
goals, but it was on the PK which will continue to suffer unless the Oilers
are able to develop/sign someone who can fill the role as well as Marchant
did. Both sides of special teams need help, but IMO it's a matter of
finding enough talent to shore it up- Nedved was enough for the PP, but who
will the Oilers' find to help anchor a solid PK unit?
Ragnarok73
--
"Life is warfare and the sojourn of a stranger in a strange land."
- Marcus Aurelius
>> Stay informed about: K Lowe and Mac T take notes...