|
Next: Good Road Trip
|
| Author |
Message |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 16) Posted: Sat Nov 18, 2006 10:19 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>pit-penguins (more info?)
|
|
|
"« LJ" <LSJR71 DeleteThis @gmail.NOcom> wrote in
news:Xns987FA4E634690LJ11@DrummerWorld.com:
> Stalker <stalker DeleteThis @yer.window> posted:
>
>> There's a thought. Try LeClair on the left side with Crosby and
>> Malkin? Maybe his fat ass can be useful for SOMETHING! :p
>
> I was referring to the PP only! Last night Malkin was placed in front
> of the net and didn't touch the puck.
>
Oh, yeah... totally agreed. He stays on the 3rd or 4th line. lol. JUST
the PP. :p >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 21, 2005 Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 17) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:23 am
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
supermario_66_no1.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com wrote:
> making all the same mistakes-- not clearing the front of the net. not
> shooting the puck. taking bad penalties. defensive lapses.
>
> the PP is killing this team. 1:30 with a 2-man advantage and NO
> scoring chances.
Make them all listen to one of those subliminal tapes/CDs while
sleeping that repeast "SHOOT THE PUCK AT THE GOAL!" ;-)
Zach >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Oct 27, 2006 Posts: 13
|
(Msg. 18) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 1:27 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Stalker" <stalker DeleteThis @yer.window> wrote in message
news:Xns987F9815BF53Fstalkeryerwindow@199.45.49.11...
> So the logical counter to your argument is this: If these four guys can
> post large numbers at even strength, why in the FUCK can they not do the
> same when up a man? Their time spent in the league isn't even a part of
> the argument.
Their time spent playing together certainly is. Power play and even strength
are two completely different animals. >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 19) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 6:05 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Zach" <netrek.RemoveThis@gmail.com> wrote in news:1163928217.483272.233920
@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:
> supermario_66_no1.RemoveThis@yahoo.com wrote:
>> making all the same mistakes-- not clearing the front of the net. not
>> shooting the puck. taking bad penalties. defensive lapses.
>>
>> the PP is killing this team. 1:30 with a 2-man advantage and NO
>> scoring chances.
>
> Make them all listen to one of those subliminal tapes/CDs while
> sleeping that repeast "SHOOT THE PUCK AT THE GOAL!" ;-)
>
> Zach
>
>
lol. Instant Immersion Hockey?
It might just be the last ditch. >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 20) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 8:36 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Geoff" <geoff.TakeThisOut@nospam.com> wrote in
news:3-GdnXOI3dWXP_3YnZ2dnUVZ_oKdnZ2d@comcast.com:
> "Stalker" <stalker.TakeThisOut@yer.window> wrote in message
> news:Xns987F9815BF53Fstalkeryerwindow@199.45.49.11...
>
>> So the logical counter to your argument is this: If these four guys
>> can post large numbers at even strength, why in the FUCK can they not
>> do the same when up a man? Their time spent in the league isn't even
>> a part of the argument.
>
> Their time spent playing together certainly is. Power play and even
> strength are two completely different animals.
>
>
>
Yeah, they are... Theres an ADVANTAGE on the POWER PLAY! >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Mar 21, 2005 Posts: 41
|
(Msg. 21) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 9:17 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Nov 19, 2006 Posts: 15
|
(Msg. 22) Posted: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:59 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
>> making all the same mistakes-- not clearing the front of the net. not
>> shooting the puck. taking bad penalties. defensive lapses.
>>
>> the PP is killing this team. 1:30 with a 2-man advantage and NO
>> scoring chances.
>
> Make them all listen to one of those subliminal tapes/CDs while
> sleeping that repeast "SHOOT THE PUCK AT THE GOAL!" ;-)
>
> Zach
And for You Zach, the special tape with "LEMIEUX WILL NOT COME BACK!" ;)
r@v >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 119
|
(Msg. 23) Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:39 am
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Stalker" <stalker.DeleteThis@yer.window> wrote in message
> Quit talking like your the only guy with an answer and/or common sense,
> coach. Everything thats talked about here is speculative. We all have
> opinions. If yours were constantly the right one, you'd have a GM job.
>
>
Hey, you gave me the GM job last year!....guess I lost it...:-p >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 24) Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 2:17 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Adam Prince" <aprince4.DeleteThis@nycap.rr.com> wrote in news:oH78h.3448$wr.3242
@twister.nyroc.rr.com:
>
> "Stalker" <stalker.DeleteThis@yer.window> wrote in message
>> Quit talking like your the only guy with an answer and/or common sense,
>> coach. Everything thats talked about here is speculative. We all have
>> opinions. If yours were constantly the right one, you'd have a GM job.
>>
>>
>
> Hey, you gave me the GM job last year!....guess I lost it...:-p
>
>
>
No no... the GM job is still yours. You aren't quite as media-
unfriendly... not quite. ;) >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: May 21, 2006 Posts: 119
|
(Msg. 25) Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2006 10:35 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Stalker" <stalker DeleteThis @yer.window> wrote in message
news:Xns98815E875CE3Cstalkeryerwindow@199.45.49.11...
> "Adam Prince" <aprince4 DeleteThis @nycap.rr.com> wrote in news:oH78h.3448$wr.3242
> @twister.nyroc.rr.com:
>
>>
>> "Stalker" <stalker DeleteThis @yer.window> wrote in message
>>> Quit talking like your the only guy with an answer and/or common sense,
>>> coach. Everything thats talked about here is speculative. We all have
>>> opinions. If yours were constantly the right one, you'd have a GM job.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hey, you gave me the GM job last year!....guess I lost it...:-p
>>
>>
>>
>
> No no... the GM job is still yours. You aren't quite as media-
> unfriendly... not quite. ;)
Whew...I was enjoying the extra income. :-p >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |
External

Since: Feb 05, 2007 Posts: 68
|
(Msg. 26) Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 5:22 pm
Post subject: Re: the honeymoon is over . . . [Login to view extended thread Info.] Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Geoff" <geoff.DeleteThis@nospam.com> wrote in
news:dsWdnfS_ebsqFP7YnZ2dnUVZ_r2dnZ2d@comcast.com:
> "Stalker" <stalker.DeleteThis@yer.window> wrote in message
> news:Xns9880CE9D6C8Astalkeryerwindow@199.45.49.11...
>
> Your point, if I understand it, is that given their skills, they could
> be a great PP unit. There's no doubt. No one could disagree. I just
> think it's unreasonable to expect that right away.
>
>
>
ok. apology accepted. (lol. im kidding)
Yeah I think we're pretty much on the same page.
Exhibit A: vs Boston. They were what? something like 0 for 7? THAT is
highly unacceptable. >> Stay informed about: the honeymoon is over . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |  |