Welcome to HockeyForumz.com!
FAQFAQ      ProfileProfile    Private MessagesPrivate Messages   Log inLog in

All's well in the 'Burgh...

 
Goto page Previous  1, 2
   Hockey Forums (Home) -> Pittsburgh Penguins RSS
Next:  Steigerwald - question  
Author Message
Krusty

External


Since: Apr 05, 2007
Posts: 19



(Msg. 16) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:57 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>pit-penguins (more info?)

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:13:14 GMT, Anton <foo.DeleteThis@none.invalid> wrote:

>rm@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>> Anton <antonv.DeleteThis@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>>> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>> hottest team
>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>
>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
>>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>>
>> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
>> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.
>
>Ok, if the Pittsburg in CA doesn't have a team and the name isn't the
>same either, then which is the other Pittsburgh (or are the other other
>Pittsburghs) you we're refering to
>earlier then?

There is only one Pittsburgh. All others are Pittsburg.

 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Anton

External


Since: Mar 16, 2007
Posts: 10



(Msg. 17) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 8:59 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

rm.RemoveThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:

>> Ok, if the Pittsburgh in CA doesn't have a team, then which is the
>> other Pitssburgh (or are the other other Pittsburghs) you we're
>> refering to earlier then?

> We were only...

"We"? Like a) you and the creatures lurking under your bed? b) you and
your mother? c) you and your boyfriend? d) you and your right hand?

> ...referring to one Pittsburgh. But the Pittsburgh we
> were referring can be a plural since more than one player is
> referred to when we call them the Pittsburghs.

They (the group of players) are called the Penguins, not the
Pittsburghs. Pittsburgh is a city. "Pittsburghs" in plural, two cities.

> This is all just a bit silly, isn't it?

I feel that way also, but then again no-one is forcing you to act like that?

> cordially, as always,
>
> rm

Cordially, for now,

--
Anton

 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Anton

External


Since: Mar 16, 2007
Posts: 10



(Msg. 18) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:04 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Krusty kirjoitti:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:13:14 GMT, Anton <foo.DeleteThis@none.invalid> wrote:
>
>> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>> Anton <antonv.DeleteThis@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>>>> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>>
>>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>>> hottest team
>>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>>
>>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
>>>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>>> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
>>> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.
>> Ok, if the Pittsburg in CA doesn't have a team and the name isn't the
>> same either, then which is the other Pittsburgh (or are the other other
>> Pittsburghs) you we're refering to
>> earlier then?
>
> There is only one Pittsburgh. All others are Pittsburg.

Ok, I wasn't the one seeing "Pittsburghs" on the ice :D I understand
that there can be two NY teams (Isles + Rangers = "New Yorks") playing
playing NHL-hockey , but two "Pittsburghs"?

--
Anton
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Krusty

External


Since: Apr 05, 2007
Posts: 19



(Msg. 19) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:14 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:04:16 GMT, Anton <foo.TakeThisOut@none.invalid> wrote:

>Krusty kirjoitti:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 18:13:14 GMT, Anton <foo.TakeThisOut@none.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>> Anton <antonv.TakeThisOut@surfeu.fi.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>>>> hottest team
>>>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>>>
>>>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-tam, thus only one Pittsburg can
>>>>> be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze, man.
>>>> Pittsburg is in California and it doesn't have a pro hockey team.
>>>> Pittsburgh, on the other hand, is in Pennsylvania.
>>> Ok, if the Pittsburg in CA doesn't have a team and the name isn't the
>>> same either, then which is the other Pittsburgh (or are the other other
>>> Pittsburghs) you we're refering to
>>> earlier then?
>>
>> There is only one Pittsburgh. All others are Pittsburg.
>
>Ok, I wasn't the one seeing "Pittsburghs" on the ice :D I understand
>that there can be two NY teams (Isles + Rangers = "New Yorks") playing
>playing NHL-hockey , but two "Pittsburghs"?

You're just dealing with rm...he seems to refer to everything in its
plural form...including himself. A very odd person.
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
rm

External


Since: Dec 08, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 20) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 9:41 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Anton <foo.TakeThisOut@none.invalid> wrote:
> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:

> "We"? Like a) you and the creatures lurking under your bed? b) you and
> your mother? c) you and your boyfriend? d) you and your right hand?

Gee, that's really clever. That rates you at least 28 days in the
clink.

G'nite Irene,

cordially, as always,

rm
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
« LJ

External


Since: Apr 04, 2007
Posts: 69



(Msg. 21) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 10:02 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

rm RemoveThis @biteme.org posted:

> Gee, that's really clever. That rates you at least 28 days in the
> clink.

"Yous" can dish out the homo talk, but can't take it? Fucking pussies, ypu
and all of the ones you refer to as "we".
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stalker

External


Since: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 68



(Msg. 22) Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2007 11:47 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"« LJ" <LSJR71.DeleteThis@gmail.NOcom> wrote in
news:Xns9903B77F278EDLJ11@DrummerWorld.com:

> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org posted:
>
>> Gee, that's really clever. That rates you at least 28 days in the
>> clink.
>
> "Yous" can dish out the homo talk, but can't take it? Fucking
> pussies, ypu and all of the ones you refer to as "we".
>
>

"Yous"! LOL!

You's is tawking like we's tawk here in Joisey now, LJ. :D
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
rm

External


Since: Dec 08, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 23) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:45 am
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Stalker <stalker.DeleteThis@yer.window> wrote:
> rm.DeleteThis@biteme.org wrote in news:eufPh.280$tk6.239@fe10.news.easynews.com:

>> Gee, that's really clever. That rates you at least 28 days in
>> the clink.
>>
>> G'nite Irene,

[nothing of consequence deleted]

Another moron. It figures.

Sid the Kid's scoring lead appears safe. Thornton could only score
one assist tonight (at least as of now) so Sid's lead would appear
to be insurmountable. Wow. He's just a teenager and he is already
winning the scoring title. And even better, his team has turned
around and in one season, going from one point out of last place
overall, to 2nd place, at this point, in the conference.

Amazing. First you get Lemieux, and now you get Crosby. Not only
is it not fair, but it is a waste of good hockey on American,
so-called "fans."

cordially, as always,

rm
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Brother Freebyrd

External


Since: Mar 18, 2007
Posts: 17



(Msg. 24) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:23 am
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

<rm RemoveThis @biteme.org> wrote in message
news:WHlPh.185015$Wn6.135740@fe06.news.easynews.com...

> Amazing. First you get Lemieux, and now you get Crosby. Not only
> is it not fair, but it is a waste of good hockey on American,
> so-called "fans."

Come to the Igloo sometime......There's nothing like Pittsburgh fans!!!
You're the waste, you started out kind of funny but now you're just a
miserable jealous troll.....
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
rm

External


Since: Dec 08, 2006
Posts: 135



(Msg. 25) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:27 am
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

Stalker <stalker DeleteThis @yer.window> wrote:
> rm DeleteThis @biteme.org wrote in news:WHlPh.185015$Wn6.135740@fe06.news.easynews.com:
>
> It's funny how you claim to have me on killfile until you think you have
> something witty and intelligent to say. Unfortunately, you have yet to say
> something witty OR intelligent.

We don't believe you are in the killfile. But we'll check right
now. Hold on.

Back. That is strange. You are supposed to be on our killfile
until April 6. We don't know what the problem is.

But we'll try it again and see if we can accommodate you.

Killfiled for 28 days.

cordially, as always,

rm
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stalker

External


Since: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 68



(Msg. 26) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:43 am
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"Brother Freebyrd" <headbangerz4jesus RemoveThis @yahoo.com> wrote in news:g7nPh.88
$hI4.12@trndny08:

> <rm RemoveThis @biteme.org> wrote in message
> news:WHlPh.185015$Wn6.135740@fe06.news.easynews.com...
>
>> Amazing. First you get Lemieux, and now you get Crosby. Not only
>> is it not fair, but it is a waste of good hockey on American,
>> so-called "fans."
>
> Come to the Igloo sometime......There's nothing like Pittsburgh fans!!!
> You're the waste, you started out kind of funny but now you're just a
> miserable jealous troll.....

I'd rather he come to New Jersey, so I could roll him, take his wallet and
leave him in a back alley with a tranvestite hooker from Atlantic City.

Yanno... make him feel at home.
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
§¦«The Wraith»¦§

External


Since: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 47



(Msg. 27) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:22 am
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

In news:cBcPh.1$IY4.0@trndny03,
Matt Davis <MDavis.TakeThisOut@KZRadio.com> typed:
> Krusty wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:43:43 +0300, Anton <antonv.TakeThisOut@surfeu.fi.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> rm.TakeThisOut@biteme.org kirjoitti:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Pittsburghs are heading into the playoffs as the
>>>> hottest team
>>>
>>> Many "Pittsburgs" = one team? How is that possible?
>>>
>>> There's only one Pittsburg with an NHL-team, thus only one
>>> Pittsburg can be on the ice at the same time. Lay down the booze,
>>> man.
>>
>>
>> Not to be a dick or anything, but there is no Pittsburg with an NHL
>> team. ;^)
>
> Pittsburgh or Pittsburg doesn't have a pro team worth talking about...

Yes, because we all know tied for 5th in the entire league doesn't mean
anything.
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
« LJ

External


Since: Apr 04, 2007
Posts: 69



(Msg. 28) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 4:59 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

rm RemoveThis @biteme.org posted:

> Amazing. First you get Lemieux, and now you get Crosby. Not only
> is it not fair, but it is a waste of good hockey on American,
> so-called "fans."

You have no idea what the word "fan" means.
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Stalker

External


Since: Feb 05, 2007
Posts: 68



(Msg. 29) Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2007 6:50 pm
Post subject: Re: All's well in the 'Burgh... [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)

"« LJ" <LSJR71.RemoveThis@gmail.NOcom> wrote in news:Xns99048406090B8LJ11
@DrummerWorld.com:

> rm.RemoveThis@biteme.org posted:
>
>> Amazing. First you get Lemieux, and now you get Crosby. Not only
>> is it not fair, but it is a waste of good hockey on American,
>> so-called "fans."
>
> You have no idea what the word "fan" means.
>

Add that to the list, man. Put it right under "cordial".
 >> Stay informed about: All's well in the 'Burgh... 
Back to top
Login to vote
Display posts from previous:   
   Hockey Forums (Home) -> Pittsburgh Penguins All times are: Pacific Time (US & Canada) (change)
Goto page Previous  1, 2
Page 2 of 2

 
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum



[ Contact us | Terms of Service/Privacy Policy ]