What a great league

"Timmy B" wrote in message

> On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 18:34:06 -0800 (PST), Rckwy5
> wrote:
>
>>On Dec 26, 9:10?pm, "Tim" wrote:
>>> "Rckwy5" wrote in message
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 26, 8:45?pm, "Tim" wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> > "Rckwy5" wrote in message
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Dec 26, 8:17?pm, Bender wrote:
>>>
>>> > >> Five minute major for hitting a guy.
>>>
>>> > >Heh heh, oh, i was waiting for Timmy or Bender to chime in on this
>>> > >ASAP.
>>>
>>> > >Orr skated right at him with his arms up. You don't need an HD TV or
>>> > >different angles to see that. The interference call was a big "?",
>>> > >but
>>> > >Orr *did* skate right at him arms up.
>>>
>>> > >If you want to argue the interference call, feel free. Other then
>>> > >that
>>> > >he skated at him arms up.
>>>
>>> > Come on, that was a clean hit. ?It was Orr's head that did the damage.
>>> >>Send me your address, Tim. I have a belated X-mas gift for you. It's a
>>> >>coupon for a new pair of glasses at Lens Crafters.
>>>
>>> Use it yourself. ?Too bad the game isn't on FOXHD or maybe you'd be able
>>> to
>>> see something. ?Wait, that doesn't help either.- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>I think your suffering from living in the past as most Rangers fans
>>do, watching that 1994 boxed set. Must have given you some bravado
>>judging by that attempt at an insult.
>
> I believe you have your Tim's mixed up. I'm the Tim that watched the
> box set.
>
> Timmy
>
>

I'm Other Tim. Maybe that will help the other guy.
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

On Dec 27, 10:04�am, "BillG" wrote:
> I suspect he had an abusive father.

So, tell us what posessed you into bying a scooter, Scooter?
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

This message is not archived
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

Bender wrote:
> Five minute major for hitting a guy.


I blame Cullen for not seeing that one coming more than "was it
legal/was his hands up?"
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

On Dec 28, 11:46 am, Rckwy5 wrote:
> Again, have you seen the FOX tape? Nope, of course not. When you see
> the FOX view, LMK.

Are you saying that you still think it was Shanahan's own stick that
hit him in the face?

If you're saying that the Fox angle was misleading, and so you and
Chico/Emerick weren't able to make the correct call, then I think Tim
will agree with you. No one doubts that you and the announcers didn't
see the camera angle behind Rozsival, because otherwise there wouldn't
have been any question in game. I'm sure if Chico and Doc had seen
that replay angle later, they would have happily admitted to their
mistake. That's one of the good things about the broadcasting teams
in the metro area... none of them are pompous enough to believe
they're above error.

Now if it was an Ottawa/Toronto/Montreal team, then I'd figure they'd
just sort of ignore it.


If you're still claiming that it WAS Shanahan's stick, then that's
different. I really don't think MSG doctors replay evidence mid-
game. I'd be happy to link you the replay again, though. Maybe you
stopped reading that thread before the conclusive angle was posted?
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league 

On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:37:32 -0800 (PST), Bender
wrote:

>On Dec 28, 11:46 am, Rckwy5 wrote:
>> Again, have you seen the FOX tape? Nope, of course not. When you see
>> the FOX view, LMK.
>
>Are you saying that you still think it was Shanahan's own stick that
>hit him in the face?
>
>If you're saying that the Fox angle was misleading, and so you and
>Chico/Emerick weren't able to make the correct call, then I think Tim
>will agree with you. No one doubts that you and the announcers didn't
>see the camera angle behind Rozsival, because otherwise there wouldn't
>have been any question in game. I'm sure if Chico and Doc had seen
>that replay angle later, they would have happily admitted to their
>mistake. That's one of the good things about the broadcasting teams
>in the metro area... none of them are pompous enough to believe
>they're above error.
>
>Now if it was an Ottawa/Toronto/Montreal team, then I'd figure they'd
>just sort of ignore it.
>
>
>If you're still claiming that it WAS Shanahan's stick, then that's
>different. I really don't think MSG doctors replay evidence mid-
>game. I'd be happy to link you the replay again, though. Maybe you
>stopped reading that thread before the conclusive angle was posted?

I could never ever put it more eloquently.

Timmy
 >> Stay informed about: What a great league