mailing list

Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK.RemoveThis@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<400E2541.5030907.RemoveThis@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> Michael wrote:
> > "Eric Cooper" <coopere.RemoveThis@blah.blah> wrote in message news:<CknNb.79009$Vs3.40465@twister.socal.rr.com>...
> >>Long live Keeley.
> >
> > Yes, but Keeley was dispatched by the "fairminded" one (according to
> > SJ, another horses ass on that list) who runs the list because he
> > apparently didn't like his personality (or style or whatever) not
> > because of the content of his posts.
>
> Keeley was not booted, he simply stopped posting. He and I had some long
> flame wars, in which both of us stepped over the line at times, but he
> was never kicked him off the list.

If you say so. You are right as usual. (Even when there's evidence to
the contrary that's pretty irrefutable.)
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK.RemoveThis@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<40060DA3.602.RemoveThis@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> Michael wrote:
> > And, by the way, I've been on literally tons of lists over the years
> > and that is the only one where this has ever happened--so I can tell
> > you where the exception is. But I suppose you'll go back to your usual
> > poor attempts at "thinking" and resort again to arguing using words
> > you don't understand.
>
> You mean like "ilk"?

Actually, I said exactly what I meant. Are you still posting "multiple
posts to a dead thread", Einstein?
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Michael wrote:
>>Keeley was not booted, he simply stopped posting. He and I had some long
>>flame wars, in which both of us stepped over the line at times, but he
>>was never kicked him off the list.
>
>
> If you say so. You are right as usual. (Even when there's evidence to
> the contrary that's pretty irrefutable.)

Post it.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Michael wrote:
> Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK DeleteThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<40060DA3.602 DeleteThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
>
>>Michael wrote:
>>
>>>And, by the way, I've been on literally tons of lists over the years
>>>and that is the only one where this has ever happened--so I can tell
>>>you where the exception is. But I suppose you'll go back to your usual
>>>poor attempts at "thinking" and resort again to arguing using words
>>>you don't understand.
>>
>>You mean like "ilk"?
>
>
> Actually, I said exactly what I meant. Are you still posting "multiple
> posts to a dead thread", Einstein?

You accused me of arguing using words I don't understand... you can
point out some cases and we can argue their merits if you like. Or you
can make claims and not support them. Either way you've already been
shown to be guilty of exactly what you accused me of. So support your
claim or stfu.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<401087A9.10006 RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> Michael wrote:
> >>Keeley was not booted, he simply stopped posting. He and I had some long
> >>flame wars, in which both of us stepped over the line at times, but he
> >>was never kicked him off the list.
> >
> >
> > If you say so. You are right as usual. (Even when there's evidence to
> > the contrary that's pretty irrefutable.)
>
> Post it.

Why don't you just ask Rob? The rough quote was "you can mock other
people but you wont mock me anymore, goodbye" or something to that
effect. Was about a year ago. Has been confirmed since this thread
came up. I checked me old mail, but I deleted most of that stuff a
long time ago and it's not in my archive.

Easy to confirm though.

In any case, I agree that the discussion is silly and there's no point
in constantly rehashing this. If you choose not to believe what I'm
saying, that's fine with me. I think the people that need to know know
The Great Democrat is no more what he pretends than Ted is the next
Savior of the Caps (as he has pretended) (speaking of hypocrites).
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<401088E3.5030205 RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> Michael wrote:
> > Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<40060DA3.602 RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> >
> >>Michael wrote:
> >>
> >>>And, by the way, I've been on literally tons of lists over the years
> >>>and that is the only one where this has ever happened--so I can tell
> >>>you where the exception is. But I suppose you'll go back to your usual
> >>>poor attempts at "thinking" and resort again to arguing using words
> >>>you don't understand.
> >>
> >>You mean like "ilk"?
> >
> >
> > Actually, I said exactly what I meant. Are you still posting "multiple
> > posts to a dead thread", Einstein?
>
> You accused me of arguing using words I don't understand... you can
> point out some cases and we can argue their merits if you like. Or you
> can make claims and not support them. Either way you've already been
> shown to be guilty of exactly what you accused me of. So support your
> claim or stfu.

Actually, I'm willing to let it drop for now. Mostly because I'm bored
with this tit-for-tat discussion and I think it's gotten silly on both
sides (yes, yours _and_ mine).
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<401088E3.5030205 RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> Michael wrote:
> > Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in message news:<40060DA3.602 RemoveThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> >
> >>Michael wrote:
> >>
> >>>And, by the way, I've been on literally tons of lists over the years
> >>>and that is the only one where this has ever happened--so I can tell
> >>>you where the exception is. But I suppose you'll go back to your usual
> >>>poor attempts at "thinking" and resort again to arguing using words
> >>>you don't understand.
> >>
> >>You mean like "ilk"?
> >
> >
> > Actually, I said exactly what I meant. Are you still posting "multiple
> > posts to a dead thread", Einstein?
>
> You accused me of arguing using words I don't understand... you can
> point out some cases and we can argue their merits if you like. Or you
> can make claims and not support them. Either way you've already been
> shown to be guilty of exactly what you accused me of. So support your
> claim or stfu.

Actually, I'm willing to let it drop for now. Mostly because I'm bored
with this tit-for-tat discussion and I think it's gotten silly on both
sides (yes, yours _and_ mine).
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

Oh, boys, it's been years.

Let it go. :-)


"Michael" <johnmichaelmars.TakeThisOut@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:cb847ce4.0401140923.69478434@posting.google.com...
> Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK.TakeThisOut@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in
message news:<4004C8A9.2090802.TakeThisOut@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> > Michael wrote:
> > > No one on Rob's list could "outclass" anyone. Unless you consider it
> > > to be a matter of beating someone with LACK of intellect. Then many of
> > > them (Sue Zirbes, for example) being one of the all-time knock out
> > > champs and one of the favorite members of the throng.
> >
> > You were booted from that list, if memory serves because you went
> > ballistic on the list and then sent her some emails that were rather,
> > um... off the handle. BTW you were one of only three people kicked from
> > that list while I was helping moderate it, all of whom went off with Ad
> > hominem attacks after being warned not to.
>
> Whatever. You are an ass yourself but in your own way but I know you
> don't think so.
>
> I call someone like I see them, maybe it's "ad hominem" ... And
> actually, from what I recall, you weren't moderating -- not publicly
> -- when I left the list. Wunderkind Richard Anderson was (supposedly).
> Truth to tell, I recall being in a foul mood that day and making some
> over the top comments but the boldness of saying them to begin with
> (all which I pretty much still feel today) showed how much respect and
> regard I have for you and Rob's associated cohorts. Give him a hug for
> me, will ya?
>
> > > This from Captain Courtesy.
> >
> > I've had plenty of arguments with people. I'm no saint. But I'll tell
> > you no one was ever kicked off the list because of confrontations
> > (private or on-list) with me.
> >
> > > Well, I was "iced" after snapping at a particularly annoying poster
> > > but I don't view it as a loss. I'm still on Zeman's list though and
> >
> > Yeah, trust me he would have kicked you sooner than Rob did; And WITHOUT
> > the warning Rob gave you. Difference is you didn't go off on Zeman's
> > list. BTW I didn't kick you off that list, you were Rob's, but for what
> > it's worth I agreed with him.
>
> Well, if the people on Zeman's list were more of the Shootzie and Sue
> variety I would have said the same thing, possibly and being "kicked
> off" and it would be no loss. The truth is I don't much care one way
> or the other but since it came up....
>
> As far as Rob's "warning" -- the man has no authority to "warn" me
> about anything. I say what I like WHEN I like and if I feel strongly
> about it no amount of "warning" by some peanuthead would change that.
> I would pretty much do the same thing if it struck me...
>
> > > have my own list with a very small list of members (and no Sue Zirbes
> > > or any of the ilk thereof).
> >
> > "ilk"? LOL She's a nice older lady who happens to annoy you because
> > she's an Avs fan.
>
> I don't know about "nice" or "lady"...the "old" part seems accurate.
> She annoyed me because she has no intelligence, doesn't know hockey,
> is never on topic, and should just be quiet because it's obvious she
> has nothing to say of any value in respect to teh game of hockey (or,
> for that matter, the Washington Capitals).
>
> I've disagreed with her tons of times, never needed to
> > go off the deep end though.
>
> Again, you can be an jerk--in your own way--but still an jerk.
>
> > I think "ilk" is a term better reserved for people who spew tons of
> > borderline psychotic invective at some old lady who disagrees with their
> > opinion.
>
> No "ilk" refers to someone with no brain.
>
> _You_ "think"??? Another case of liberal definition. As to what is
> and isn't psychotic, obviously you understand what is and isn't
> psychosis the same way you understand most of the rest of your
> statements -- you don't.
>
> Have a nice life.
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list 

"MsCapsFan" <mscapsfan DeleteThis @yahooREMOVETHIS.ie> wrote in message news:<4016bfa1$0$11465$61fed72c@news.rcn.com>...
> Oh, boys, it's been years.
>
> Let it go. :-)

There's nothing _TO_ let go. Just clearing up a few facts for the benefit of others.
>
> "Michael" <johnmichaelmars DeleteThis @yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:cb847ce4.0401140923.69478434@posting.google.com...
> > Simon Juncal <SPAMERSSUCK DeleteThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com> wrote in
> message news:<4004C8A9.2090802 DeleteThis @usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com>...
> > > Michael wrote:
> > > > No one on Rob's list could "outclass" anyone. Unless you consider it
> > > > to be a matter of beating someone with LACK of intellect. Then many of
> > > > them (Sue Zirbes, for example) being one of the all-time knock out
> > > > champs and one of the favorite members of the throng.
> > >
> > > You were booted from that list, if memory serves because you went
> > > ballistic on the list and then sent her some emails that were rather,
> > > um... off the handle. BTW you were one of only three people kicked from
> > > that list while I was helping moderate it, all of whom went off with Ad
> > > hominem attacks after being warned not to.
> >
> > Whatever. You are an ass yourself but in your own way but I know you
> > don't think so.
> >
> > I call someone like I see them, maybe it's "ad hominem" ... And
> > actually, from what I recall, you weren't moderating -- not publicly
> > -- when I left the list. Wunderkind Richard Anderson was (supposedly).
> > Truth to tell, I recall being in a foul mood that day and making some
> > over the top comments but the boldness of saying them to begin with
> > (all which I pretty much still feel today) showed how much respect and
> > regard I have for you and Rob's associated cohorts. Give him a hug for
> > me, will ya?
> >
> > > > This from Captain Courtesy.
> > >
> > > I've had plenty of arguments with people. I'm no saint. But I'll tell
> > > you no one was ever kicked off the list because of confrontations
> > > (private or on-list) with me.
> > >
> > > > Well, I was "iced" after snapping at a particularly annoying poster
> > > > but I don't view it as a loss. I'm still on Zeman's list though and
> > >
> > > Yeah, trust me he would have kicked you sooner than Rob did; And WITHOUT
> > > the warning Rob gave you. Difference is you didn't go off on Zeman's
> > > list. BTW I didn't kick you off that list, you were Rob's, but for what
> > > it's worth I agreed with him.
> >
> > Well, if the people on Zeman's list were more of the Shootzie and Sue
> > variety I would have said the same thing, possibly and being "kicked
> > off" and it would be no loss. The truth is I don't much care one way
> > or the other but since it came up....
> >
> > As far as Rob's "warning" -- the man has no authority to "warn" me
> > about anything. I say what I like WHEN I like and if I feel strongly
> > about it no amount of "warning" by some peanuthead would change that.
> > I would pretty much do the same thing if it struck me...
> >
> > > > have my own list with a very small list of members (and no Sue Zirbes
> > > > or any of the ilk thereof).
> > >
> > > "ilk"? LOL She's a nice older lady who happens to annoy you because
> > > she's an Avs fan.
> >
> > I don't know about "nice" or "lady"...the "old" part seems accurate.
> > She annoyed me because she has no intelligence, doesn't know hockey,
> > is never on topic, and should just be quiet because it's obvious she
> > has nothing to say of any value in respect to teh game of hockey (or,
> > for that matter, the Washington Capitals).
> >
> > I've disagreed with her tons of times, never needed to
> > > go off the deep end though.
> >
> > Again, you can be an jerk--in your own way--but still an jerk.
> >
> > > I think "ilk" is a term better reserved for people who spew tons of
> > > borderline psychotic invective at some old lady who disagrees with their
> > > opinion.
> >
> > No "ilk" refers to someone with no brain.
> >
> > _You_ "think"??? Another case of liberal definition. As to what is
> > and isn't psychotic, obviously you understand what is and isn't
> > psychosis the same way you understand most of the rest of your
> > statements -- you don't.
> >
> > Have a nice life.
 >> Stay informed about: mailing list