 |
|
|
|
Next: Naegele On WCCO Radio
|
| Author |
Message |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 205
|
(Msg. 1) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 am
Post subject: 4 rookies on the roster
Archived from groups: alt>sports>hockey>nhl>ny-rangers (more info?)
|
|
|
Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan and Girardi. Pretty cool to start a season with
that many rookies. Nice to have that kind of young depth. Especially when
you put yourself into such a cap situation where you need inexpensive
quality depth to be successful.
Normally 2 rookie defensemen on a roster is scary. But the way Girardi
played last season and the fact that no matter how shaky Staal might be at
the start, he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy, it
makes it a little more comforting. Girardi and Staal have the potential to
be with this team for some time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 | |
External
Since: Jun 22, 2007
Posts: 35
|
(Msg. 2) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 4, 10:34 am, "kovy" wrote:
> Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan and Girardi. Pretty cool to start a season with
> that many rookies. Nice to have that kind of young depth. Especially when
> you put yourself into such a cap situation where you need inexpensive
> quality depth to be successful.
>
> Normally 2 rookie defensemen on a roster is scary. But the way Girardi
> played last season and the fact that no matter how shaky Staal might be at
> the start, he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy, it
> makes it a little more comforting. Girardi and Staal have the potential to
> be with this team for some time.
GIradi and Callahan are only technical rookies ... they are
experienced grizzled playoff vets in reality ... |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 3) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 14
|
(Msg. 4) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:34 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 4, 12:01 pm, "kovy" wrote:
> "Rckwy5" wrote in message
>
>
>
> >> he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy,
>
> > Don't forget about that moron Rachunek.
>
> I'm trying very hard to.
Perhaps moron was to strong a word.
"Headache" sounds better. >> Stay informed about: 4 rookies on the roster |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 02, 2007
Posts: 134
|
(Msg. 5) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:41 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 4, 7:42 am, Bender wrote:
> On Oct 4, 8:34 am, "kovy" wrote:
>
> > Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan and Girardi. Pretty cool to start a season with
> > that many rookies. Nice to have that kind of young depth. Especially when
> > you put yourself into such a cap situation where you need inexpensive
> > quality depth to be successful.
>
> > Normally 2 rookie defensemen on a roster is scary. But the way Girardi
> > played last season and the fact that no matter how shaky Staal might be at
> > the start, he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy, it
> > makes it a little more comforting. Girardi and Staal have the potential to
> > be with this team for some time.
>
> Is Girardi really considered a rookie? How many games do you have to
> play for it to be considered your rookie season?
The current standard for the Calder Trophy is no more than 25 games.
The Devils Andy Greene only played in 23 games last year, so he's
still a rookie.
Girardi played in 34. He can't win the Calder, so I believe that
doesn't make him technically a rookie but he certainly isn't a
veteran, either.
Signed,
R.J. >> Stay informed about: 4 rookies on the roster |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 161
|
(Msg. 6) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:45 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
On Oct 4, 8:34 am, "kovy" wrote:
> Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan and Girardi. Pretty cool to start a season with
> that many rookies. Nice to have that kind of young depth. Especially when
> you put yourself into such a cap situation where you need inexpensive
> quality depth to be successful.
>
> Normally 2 rookie defensemen on a roster is scary. But the way Girardi
> played last season and the fact that no matter how shaky Staal might be at
> the start, he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy, it
> makes it a little more comforting. Girardi and Staal have the potential to
> be with this team for some time.
Is Girardi really considered a rookie? How many games do you have to
play for it to be considered your rookie season? >> Stay informed about: 4 rookies on the roster |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 205
|
(Msg. 7) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:57 am
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
"Bender" wrote in message
> On Oct 4, 8:34 am, "kovy" wrote:
>> Staal, Dubinsky, Callahan and Girardi. Pretty cool to start a season with
>> that many rookies. Nice to have that kind of young depth. Especially when
>> you put yourself into such a cap situation where you need inexpensive
>> quality depth to be successful.
>>
>> Normally 2 rookie defensemen on a roster is scary. But the way Girardi
>> played last season and the fact that no matter how shaky Staal might be
>> at
>> the start, he can't possibly make more mistakes than Malik and Rozy, it
>> makes it a little more comforting. Girardi and Staal have the potential
>> to
>> be with this team for some time.
>
> Is Girardi really considered a rookie? How many games do you have to
> play for it to be considered your rookie season?
I made it up. Please don't take this away from me. >> Stay informed about: 4 rookies on the roster |
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
External
Since: Sep 11, 2007
Posts: 205
|
(Msg. 8) Posted: Thu Oct 04, 2007 12:01 pm
Post subject: Re: 4 rookies on the roster [Login to view extended thread Info.]
Archived from groups: per prev. post (more info?)
|
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
| |
| Related Topics: | Anaheim in 6, Ottawa in 6 - And the Ducks take home the Cup.
How was that any different.... - How was that waved-off goal in Buffalo any different than the one in game 1 against the Rangers? Why did that one count, and this one didn't? By the way, VS. is absolutely terrible. Joe Beninati? Why don't they just get Rick Jeanerette or some other....
Scary good - More "scary" than "good".
Teeeeee-mu Selanne! - And Hockey Town is stunned. Woooo-Hooo!!
Team +/- leader? - NY Rangers website lists top plus/minus player for 06-07 season was ... Marek Malik??? How the hell is that possible? Is it simply that he played most often with the top scoring line. Hopefully those in charge will look beyond the stat ... PLEASE? |
|
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You can edit your posts in this forum
You can delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Profile
Private Messages
Log in
